Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

From Defining to Designing: Communicative Specifications versus Communicative Methodology in Foreign Language Teaching

From Defining to Designing: Communicative Specifications versus Communicative Methodology in... <jats:p>This paper attempts to explore some of the implications of viewing language learning as a process that deals with a product that is not static. Language, we can increasingly see, is not a set of definable and prearranged tokens but a process of linguistic and cultural negotiation of meaning. Students have to develop their innate ability to use language for their own purposes in interaction with the purposes of other language users. Communicative syllabuses have been discussed partly through a recognition of this need, but a discussion of syllabus organisation is not enough, for the methodological implications are much more important. If languages are not, in principle, discrete, language teaching will not be served well if it is based on the assumption that we can specify the learner's product exactly. All syllabuses tend to concentrate on the product, or content. This paper argues that it is time to move away from syllabus definition, which has been adequately discussed for the current state of classroom practice.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Second Language Acquisition CrossRef

From Defining to Designing: Communicative Specifications versus Communicative Methodology in Foreign Language Teaching

Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 (1): 1-9 – Jan 1, 1980

From Defining to Designing: Communicative Specifications versus Communicative Methodology in Foreign Language Teaching


Abstract

<jats:p>This paper attempts to explore some of the implications of viewing language learning as a process that deals with a product that is not static. Language, we can increasingly see, is not a set of definable and prearranged tokens but a process of linguistic and cultural negotiation of meaning. Students have to develop their innate ability to use language for their own purposes in interaction with the purposes of other language users. Communicative syllabuses have been discussed partly through a recognition of this need, but a discussion of syllabus organisation is not enough, for the methodological implications are much more important. If languages are not, in principle, discrete, language teaching will not be served well if it is based on the assumption that we can specify the learner's product exactly. All syllabuses tend to concentrate on the product, or content. This paper argues that it is time to move away from syllabus definition, which has been adequately discussed for the current state of classroom practice.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/from-defining-to-designing-communicative-specifications-versus-bhhQ8bx4dU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0272-2631
DOI
10.1017/s0272263100000140
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>This paper attempts to explore some of the implications of viewing language learning as a process that deals with a product that is not static. Language, we can increasingly see, is not a set of definable and prearranged tokens but a process of linguistic and cultural negotiation of meaning. Students have to develop their innate ability to use language for their own purposes in interaction with the purposes of other language users. Communicative syllabuses have been discussed partly through a recognition of this need, but a discussion of syllabus organisation is not enough, for the methodological implications are much more important. If languages are not, in principle, discrete, language teaching will not be served well if it is based on the assumption that we can specify the learner's product exactly. All syllabuses tend to concentrate on the product, or content. This paper argues that it is time to move away from syllabus definition, which has been adequately discussed for the current state of classroom practice.</jats:p>

Journal

Studies in Second Language AcquisitionCrossRef

Published: Jan 1, 1980

There are no references for this article.