journal article
LitStream Collection
The Problem with Shamanism: Religion, Ontology, and Ethical Authority in South Korea
doi: N/Apmid: N/A
Abstract: This article traces the historical reclassification of Korean shamanism ( musok ) from the Confucian category of ŭmsa (illicit rites) to the modern designation of "superstition," arguing that this shift reshaped the evaluation of ritual mediation, authority, and moral legitimacy. In the Chosŏn period, critiques of ŭmsa focused less on belief in spirits than on the problem of unauthorized mediation within a hierarchical ritual order. With the emergence of modern classificatory regimes, this framework was displaced by the category of misin (superstition), through which shamanic practices were recast as epistemically unreliable and morally suspect. By connecting this historical transformation to contemporary political controversies, the article shows how successive regimes of classification continue to structure public perceptions of spiritual mediation. It argues that debates surrounding Korean shamanism reveal deeper tensions between competing models of mediation, authority, and ethical responsibility, demonstrating how categories such as "religion" and "superstition" are historically produced and mobilized in modern public life.