Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    Subject:
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    Publisher:
    Springer Berlin Heidelberg — Springer Journals
    ISSN:
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    73

    2026

    Volume 313
    Issue 1 (May)

    2025

    Volume OnlineFirst
    March
    Volume 313
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 312
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 311
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2024

    Volume 310
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 309
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2023

    Volume 308
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 307
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2022

    Volume OnlineFirst
    December
    Volume 306
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 305
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2021

    Volume 304
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 303
    Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume OnlineFirst
    MarchJanuary
    Volume 304
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 303
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 302
    Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 301
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume OnlineFirst
    NovemberJuneMayMayAprilMarchFebruaryFebruaryJanuary
    Volume 300
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 299
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume OnlineFirst
    NovemberJuneJuneMay
    Volume 299
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 298
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 297
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 297
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 296
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 295
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 295
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 294
    Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 293
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2015

    Volume 294
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 293
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 292
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 291
    Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 292
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 291
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 290
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 289
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Mar)
    Volume 266
    Issue 2 (Feb)
    Volume 93
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 289
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 288
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 287
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 288
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 287
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 286
    Supplement 1 (Oct)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 285
    Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 285
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 284
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 283
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 1 (Mar)

    2010

    Volume 284
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 283
    Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 282
    Supplement 1 (Oct)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 281
    Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (May)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 283
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 282
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 281
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 280
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 279
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Mar)
    Volume 258
    Issue 3 (Mar)

    2008

    Volume 280
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 279
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 278
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 277
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Feb)
    Volume 271
    Issue 1 (Sep)

    2007

    Volume 278
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 277
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 276
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 275
    Supplement 1 (May)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 253
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 251
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 225
    Issue 4 (Feb)
    Volume 222
    Issue 4 (Feb)
    Volume 217
    Issue 2 (Feb)
    Volume 203
    Issue 3 (Feb)
    Volume 197
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 176
    Issue 6 (Feb)

    2006

    Volume 276
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 275
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 274
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 273
    Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jan)
    Volume 259
    Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 255
    Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 253
    Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 252
    Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 250
    Issue 4 (Mar)
    Volume 249
    Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 248
    Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 247
    Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 245
    Issue 4 (Apr)
    Volume 238
    Issue 4 (May)
    Volume 237
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 235
    Issue 4 (May)
    Volume 228
    Issue 4 (May)
    Volume 201
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 166
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 85
    Issue 1 (Jun)

    2005

    Volume 274
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 273
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 272
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 271
    Supplement 1 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 270
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 267
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 261
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 258
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 257
    Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 255
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 254
    Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 244
    Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 242
    Issue 4 (Jan)
    Volume 240
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 239
    Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 237
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 236
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 234
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 233
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 231
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 230
    Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 229
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 227
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 226
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)
    Volume 218
    Issue 2 (Mar)
    Volume 216
    Issue 4 (Mar)
    Volume 210
    Issue 4 (Apr)
    Volume 204
    Issue 3 (Apr)
    Volume 194
    Issue 4 (Feb)
    Volume 192
    Issue 3 (Feb)
    Volume 188
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 187
    Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)
    Volume 186
    Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 184
    Issue 2 (Apr)
    Volume 183
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 179
    Issue 2 (Mar)
    Volume 178
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 177
    Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 175
    Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 174
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 173
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 172
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 171
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 170
    Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 169
    Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 168
    Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 167
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 165
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 164
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 163
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 162
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 161
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 160
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 159
    Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 158
    Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (May)
    Volume 157
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 156
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)
    Volume 155
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 154
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 153
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 152
    Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 151
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 150
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 149
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 148
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 147
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 146
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 145
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 144
    Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 143
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 142
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 141
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 140
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 139
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)
    Volume 138
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 137
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)
    Volume 136
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 135
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 134
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 133
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 132
    Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 131
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 130
    Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 129
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 128
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jun)
    Volume 127
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 126
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 125
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)
    Volume 124
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 123
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 122
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Jun)
    Volume 121
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 120
    Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 119
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 118
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 117
    Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 116
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 115
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 114
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 113
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 112
    Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 111
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 110
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 109
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 108
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 107
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 106
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 105
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 104
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 103
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 102
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)
    Volume 101
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 100
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 99
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 98
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 97
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 96
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 95
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 94
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 93
    Issue 2 (Apr)
    Volume 92
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 91
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 90
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 89
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 88
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 87
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 86
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 85
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)
    Volume 84
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 83
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 82
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 81
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 80
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 79
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 78
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 77
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 76
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 75
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 74
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 73
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 72
    Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 71
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 70
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 69
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 68
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 67
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 66
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 65
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 64
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 63
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 62
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 61
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 60
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 59
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 58
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 57
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 56
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 55
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 54
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 53
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 52
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 51
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 50
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 49
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 48
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 47
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 46
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 45
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 44
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 43
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 42
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 41
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 40
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 39
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 38
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 37
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 36
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 35
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 34
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 33
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 32
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 31
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 30
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 29
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 28
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 27
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 26
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 25
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 24
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 23
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 22
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 21
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 20
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 19
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 18
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 17
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 16
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 15
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 14
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 13
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 12
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 11
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 10
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 9
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 8
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 7
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 6
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 5
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 4
    Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 3
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 2
    Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 1
    Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jul)

    2004

    Volume 273
    Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 272
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 271
    Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 270
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 269
    Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Jan)
    Volume 258
    Issue 2 (Oct)
    Volume 256
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 246
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 244
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 243
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 241
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 240
    Issue 3 (Jul)
    Volume 239
    Issue 4 (Jul)
    Volume 234
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 225
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 224
    Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 223
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 222
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 221
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 220
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 219
    Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 218
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 217
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 216
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 215
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 214
    Issue 4 (Nov)
    Volume 213
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 212
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 211
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)
    Volume 210
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 209
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 208
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 207
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)
    Volume 206
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 205
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 204
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 203
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 202
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 200
    Issue 7 (Nov)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 199
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 198
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 197
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)
    Volume 196
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 195
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 194
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 193
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 192
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 191
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 190
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 189
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 188
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)
    Volume 187
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 185
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 184
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 182
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 181
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 180
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 179
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 177
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Dec)
    Volume 176
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

    2003

    Volume 271
    Issue 2 (Dec)
    Volume 270
    Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 269
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 268
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 267
    Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 270
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 269
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)
    Volume 268
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)
    Volume 267
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 266
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2001

    Volume 265
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 264
    Issue 4 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 264
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 263
    Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Feb)

    1999

    Volume 263
    Issue 2 (Dec)
    Volume 262
    Issue 4 (Apr)

    1998

    Volume 262
    Issue 2 (Nov)
    Volume 261
    Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)

    1997

    Volume 261
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 260
    Issue 4 (Oct)
    Volume 259
    Issue 4 (Aug)

    1996

    Volume 258
    Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)

    1995

    Volume 256
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1993

    Volume 253
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1992

    Volume 252
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 251
    Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)

    1991

    Volume 249
    Issue 2 (Aug)
    Volume 248
    Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Feb)

    1990

    Volume 248
    Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 247
    Issue 4 (Jul)

    1987

    Volume 241
    Supplement 1 (Mar)

    1985

    Volume 238
    Issue 1-4 (Sep)
    Volume 237
    Supplement 1 (Sep)

    1981

    Volume 232
    Issue 4 (Oct)

    1979

    Volume 227
    Issue 3 (Sep)

    1971

    Volume 211
    Issue 1-2 (Mar)

    1961

    Volume 196
    Issue 4 (Jul)

    1955

    Volume 186
    Issue 1 (May)

    1935

    Volume 159
    Issue 1-4 (Feb)

    1927

    Volume 129
    Issue 3 (Jan)

    1914

    Volume 102
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1913

    Volume 100
    Issue 2 (Jun)

    1912

    Volume 97
    Issue 3 (Oct)

    1911

    Volume 93
    Issue 3 (Oct)

    1910

    Volume 92
    Issue 2 (Jun)

    1909

    Volume 89
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1908

    Volume 86
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1907

    Volume 83
    Issue 3 (Oct)

    1902

    Volume 66
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1901

    Volume 64
    Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 62
    Issue 2 (Jun)

    1898

    Volume 55
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1876

    Volume 9
    Issue 2 (Jun)
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Prognostic value of FDG-PET SUV changes in cervical cancer following radiation therapy: a retrospective cohort study

    Bale, Claudia A.; Pearce, Janina V.; Deng, Xiaoyan; Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar; Yarden, Nophar; Sport, Catherine; Miller, Devin T.; Randall, Leslie M.; Fields, Emma; Sullivan, Stephanie A.

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08330-5pmid: 41609820

    PurposeThis study sought to determine the relationship between cervical cancer recurrence and post-treatment change in standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the cervix and lymph nodes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who received curative intent radiation therapy for biopsy-proven stage I–IVA locally advanced cervical cancer at a single tertiary referral center from 2009 to 2021. The exposure was percent change in SUV from pre- to post-treatment FDG-PET scans at the cervix and lymph nodes. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. Firth’s penalized logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations.Results55 patients met eligibility criteria. Recurrence rate was 27% (15/55); of these, 33% had local recurrence (5/55) and 67% had distant recurrence (10/55). Median percent decrease of cervical SUV after treatment in those with and without recurrence was similar (71.4 vs 68.8, p = 0.89); this remained consistent when analyzing those with local recurrence only (70.5, p = 0.95). When the percent decrease in cervical SUV was examined in intervals (< 25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, > 75%), this was also not predictive of local (p = 0.91) or overall (p = 0.75) recurrence. Median percent decrease at the most avid and distant lymph node in those with and without recurrence was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Neither change in cervical nor lymph node SUV was associated with overall or progression-free survival.ConclusionChanges in SUV after treatment may not be a reliable stand-alone marker for predicting recurrence or survival in locally advanced cervical cancer after treatment with radiation therapy.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Risk factors for combined vaginal–cesarean delivery in the vertex–vertex twins: a case–control study

    Manor, Itay; Gabbai, Daniel; Baruch, Yoav; Yogev, Yariv; Hiersch, Liran; Attali, Emmanuel

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08406-2pmid: 41886092

    PurposeTwin pregnancies pose unique challenges during labor, particularly the risk of cesarean section for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first—termed a combined vaginal–cesarean delivery. Although nonvertex presentation of the second twin is a recognized risk factor, predictors in vertex–vertex twin pregnancies remain unclear. The objective of this study was to identify maternal, pregnancy-related, intrapartum, and fetal risk factors associated with combined vaginal–cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies with vertex–vertex presentation.MethodsA retrospective single-center case–control study was conducted at Lis Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, between 2012 and 2023. The study included women with twin pregnancies in vertex–vertex presentation who attempted vaginal delivery. The case group comprised women who underwent combined vaginal–cesarean delivery (vaginal birth of the first twin followed by cesarean of the second), while controls delivered both twins vaginally. Maternal, pregnancy-related, intrapartum, and fetal variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.ResultsAmong 503 twin deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 22 (4.4%) resulted in combined vaginal–cesarean delivery. Maternal characteristics, labor features, and fetal parameters were similar between groups. Gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly more frequent among combined deliveries (31.8% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.009) and remained the only independent risk factor after adjustment (odds ratio 4.06; 95% CI 1.57–10.53; p = 0.004). No other associations were found between the delivery outcome and other factors, including maternal age, parity, previous cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, instrumental delivery of the first twin, gestational age at delivery, and intertwin birthweight discordance.ConclusionsIn vertex–vertex twin pregnancies, successful vaginal delivery is achieved in approximately 95% of cases. Gestational diabetes mellitus independently increases the likelihood of cesarean delivery for the second twin, suggesting a possible metabolic influence on labor dynamics. Optimal glycemic control and vigilant intrapartum management may help minimize cesarean conversions. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the effect of diabetes severity and treatment type.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Unlocking ovarian rejuvenation with platelet-rich plasma: systematic review and proposed clinical framework for Controlled use in poor prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation

    Alageel, Arwa A.

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08338-xpmid: 41760981

    BackgroundPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used as an adjunctive treatment in various medical fields, including orthopaedics, plastic surgery, dermatology, and wound healing. However, PRP application in reproductive medicine, particularly for fertility restoration, remains controversial, specifically for women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), and pre-menopause. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the existing literature on autologous PRP use for ovarian rejuvenation, with a focus on refining and standardising PRP protocols and identifying appropriate candidate populations.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted on the autologous PRP use using Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, NCBI, and Google Scholar databases. Studies on PRP application in reproductive medicine were identified and classified into two categories: DOR and POI. The PRP preparation protocol was assessed, and the results were compared. This narrative systematic review, carried out in compliance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, combined results, although meta-analysis was not feasible due to significant variation in study design, PRP preparation, and outcome measures.ResultsSeveral studies reported restoration of menstruation following intraovarian PRP administration in women with POI. In women with DOR, studies reported changes in ovarian reserve markers, including increases in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and reductions in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels; however, these changes were not consistently associated with higher antral follicle counts or oocyte yield. Instead, sseveral studies reported higher proportions of mature oocytes and pregnancy and live birth outcomes, particularly following repeated PRP treatment cycles in women with long-standing ovarian dysfunction.ConclusionsIntraovarian PRP may have a potential role in activating dormant follicles in a selected subset of women with poor ovarian response. However, the current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, supporting its use only within structured clinical or research protocols until higher-quality, standardised studies are available.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Pain and functional outcomes after surgical versus hormonal treatment in rectovaginal endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study

    Werner, Franziska; Velho, Renata Voltolini; Mechsner, Sylvia

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08495-zpmid: 42323744

    PurposeTo compare changes in pain-related symptoms, bowel and bladder function, rectal bleeding, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction in women with rectovaginal endometriosis treated either surgically or with hormonal treatment alone in a tertiary referral centre.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included women with rectovaginal endometriosis treated at a tertiary endometriosis centre with either surgical excision or hormonal treatment alone after informed consent. Standardised questionnaires assessed pain, functional symptoms, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Symptom changes were categorised as improvement, stability, or worsening. Between-group comparisons were performed using Mann–Whitney U tests and Pearson’s chi-square tests, with effect sizes reported (r or Cramér’s V). The analysis was exploratory.ResultsA total of 210 women were included (surgical n = 164; hormonal n = 46). Baseline pain intensity did not differ significantly between groups, although bowel dysfunction and rectal bleeding were more prevalent in the surgical cohort. Following treatment, approximately 80% of women in both groups reported improvement in pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea. Improvements in dyspareunia, dyschezia, and functional outcomes were observed in substantial proportions. Between-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences in change categories across pain, functional symptoms, quality of life, or treatment satisfaction (all p ≥ 0.08), with consistently small effect sizes.ConclusionBoth surgical and hormonal treatment were associated with substantial improvements in patient-reported outcomes in women with rectovaginal endometriosis. Direct comparison revealed no significant differences in outcome trajectories, supporting an individualised treatment approach.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Editorial Expression of Concern: Does Cabergoline help in decreasing endometrioma size compared to LHRH agonist? A prospective randomized study

    Hamid, Amr M. Salaheldin Abdel; Madkour, Wael A. Ismail; Moawad, Ashraf; Elzaher, Mohamed Abd; Roberts, Mary P.

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08374-7pmid: 41784847

    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    PTHrP-associated hypercalcemia in gynecologic malignancies: a scoping review

    Bohne, Shara Maria; Wegwitz, Florian; Kruse-Wieczorek, Judith; Langer, Laura; Gallwas, Julia; Ströbel, Philipp; Hasanov, Mir Fuad

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08488-ypmid: 42307672

    Purpose Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) is a peptide hormone that shares structural similarity with parathyroid hormone (PTH) and binds to the same receptor, leading to increased calcium levels. Humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) is typically mediated by tumor-derived PTHrP and accounts for the majority of cases of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia, whereas it is rarely observed in benign conditions. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to map and provide a structured and transparent overview of reported cases of HHM in malignant gynecologic tumors.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science, complemented by manual reference screening and additional searches using Google Scholar, identifying relevant articles published between 1973 and 2025. Clinical and biochemical characteristics were extracted and analyzed descriptively.ResultsA total of 51 reported cases were identified, including 29 ovarian, 12 uterine, 5 vulvar, and 5 cervical tumors. Among the 29 cases in which serum PTHrP was measured, levels were elevated in 28 patients. In the remaining cases, suppressed PTH levels, exclusion of alternative causes, or indirect evidence from tissue immunohistochemistry (IHC) supported PTHrP involvement. Preoperative calcium levels ranged from 10.5 to 21.3 mg/dL. Following tumor resection, both PTHrP and calcium levels declined and normalized in most patients.ConclusionThese findings suggest that although rare, PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia represents a clinically relevant paraneoplastic phenomenon in gynecologic malignancies. Prospective studies with standardized biochemical and tissue-based assessment are needed to clarify its epidemiology and clinical significance.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Editorial Expression of Concern: Stimulation of the endometrium with high-grade blastocyst culture supernatant (SEHB) can improve pregnancy outcome for couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): a randomized clinical trial

    Tehraninejad, Ensieh Shahrokhe; Tanha, Fateme Davari; Ghajarzadeh, Mahsa; Zandieh, Zahra; Aziminekoo, Elham; Zanjani, Haleh Rahmanpour

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08397-0pmid: 41874716

    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Low PAPP-A levels and their association with adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies

    Ioakeim, Sapantzoglou; Kontopoulou, Afroditi Maria; Christina, Karasmani; Zacharias, Fasoulakis; Chatziioannou, Maria Ioanna; Afroditi, Pegkou; Maria, Simou; Ioannis, Pafilis; Athina, Souka; Marianna, Theodora; Panagiotis, Antsaklis; Georgios, Daskalakis

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08299-7pmid: 41553376

    PurposeWhile in singleton pregnancies the maternal serum biomarkers used in the first-trimester screening for aneuploidies, particularly PAPP-A, may be, also, used as predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes, there is a scarcity of data regarding the association of first-trimester biomarkers with unfavorable pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies. The main purpose of our study was to evaluate the association of low PAPP-A levels in twin pregnancies with the subsequent development of perinatal complications.Methods454 twin pregnancies were recruited over a period of 11 years, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. First trimester assessment at 11 + 0–13 + 6 weeks included examination of fetal anatomy and markers of aneuploidy and measurement of the maternal serum concentration of PAPP-A and free b-hCG. The outcomes under investigation were preterm rupture of the membranes, preterm delivery earlier than 32, 34, and 36 weeks, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disease of the pregnancy (including pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia), intrauterine demise, birth weight difference of more than 25% among the fetuses and composite adverse pregnancy outcome (which included preterm rupture of the membranes, preterm delivery earlier than < 36 weeks, hypertensive disease of the pregnancy, and gestational diabetes).ResultsLow first-trimester PAPP-A levels were related with preterm birth, whereas high levels were associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. When using specific cut-off points such as low PAPP-A MoM < 5th and < 10th centile or high PAPP-A MoM > 90th and 95th centile, these associations were not significant.ConclusionsLow first-trimester PAPP-A levels were related with preterm birth, whereas high levels were associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. When specific cut-off points were investigated, these associations were not statistically significant.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    The upper airway parameter: the potential prognostic clue for congenital diaphragmatic hernia—a prospective randomized controlled study

    Song, Shijing; Liang, Hua; Hou, Chenxiao; Zheng, Yucong; Xiong, Xiaowei; Xia, Taihui; Wang, Jingjing; Wu, Qingqing

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08275-1pmid: 41528526

    PurposeIn our previous studies, differences in the upper airway inner diameter between fetuses with thoracic space occupying lesions and normal fetuses were found, but their clinical value has not been further validated. We designed a prospective case–control animal experiment to validate its prognostic value in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).MethodsUsing Nitrofen to create a fetal SD-rat model of CDH. Calculate the upper airway inner diameter and lung parameters of fetal rats on ultrasonic image and histology sections, and calculate the correlation between the upper airway and lung parameters. Design experiments to rule out the impact of major cardiac malformations on airway development, the correlation between the upper airway inner diameter and the area of CDH was also calculated.ResultsThere was no significant difference in lung and upper airway parameters between the control group and the group with unsuccessful CDH modeling. The upper airway and lung parameters of fetal rat with CDH were significantly smaller than those without CDH (p < 0.01). The correlation between upper airway inner diameter and lung volume is better than that with lung weight, especially the upper airway inner diameter measured on ultrasound images (p < 0.01, R = 0.76). In the CDH group, the airway lumen diameter was inversely correlated with the hernia area (p = 0.005, R = 0.507).ConclusionsThe upper airway inner diameter of fetal rat was correlated with lung volume, demonstrating the potential predictive value for fetal prognosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    journal article
    Open Access Collection
    Financial distress among women with advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Germany: secondary analysis of prospective ePROCOM data of a two-center cohort

    Graf, Joachim; Abele, Harald; Wallwiener, Markus; Kantelhardt, Eva J.; Brucker, Sara Y.; Simoes, Elisabeth

    2026 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    doi: 10.1007/s00404-026-08523-ypmid: 42455164

    Key messageIn this study, half of all female patients with advanced and metastatic breast cancer reported experiencing financial difficulties. This highlights the need for gynecology and oncology specialists to also address patients’ socio-medical needs. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) must be used to identify such areas of concern.AbstractPurposeThe aim was to investigate whether and to what extent female patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy report financial difficulties due to their physical condition and/or the effects of medical treatment in relation to the German reference cohort.MethodsA secondary data analysis was performed using data collected prospectively as part of the ePROCOM study. A total of n = 168 female patients who had answered questions regarding financial implications of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were included in the analysis. Unpaired t tests (Welch) and Chi-square tests as well as multiple regressions were conducted. A bilateral p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses (alpha = 0.05).ResultsThe prevalence of financial distress was 50.0% (95%-CI 42.4%; 57.6%), defined as a response of at least 2 (“a little”) on a 4-point Likert scale. Between the reference cohort scored 4.8 and the breast cancer cohort scored 28.8, there was a significant difference of 24 ± 5.19 score points (p < 0.001; 95%-CI 18.81, 29.19) in financial burden. Overall, the regression model explained 27.7% of the total variance in financial burden through HRQoL, age, and civil status (R2 = 0.277).ConclusionWomen with advanced or metastatic breast cancer reported substantially higher financial burden than the female German reference population. Lower HRQoL, younger age, and living alone were associated with greater financial impact. These findings support routine assessment of financial distress in those patients and suggest that ePRO-based screening may help identify patients in need of early social-medical support.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 230 Articles

    Previous12345…23Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    New England Journal of MedicineBMC MedicineMedicine (United States)Clinical ScienceMedical Journal of AustraliaSleep MedicineNature Reviews Disease PrimersBMJ OpenBritish Medical BulletinAnnals of Medicine