Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
korean studies, vol. 27 take steps to disengage militarily from South Korea, thereby putting a longawaited ending to the Korean War. The United States must also move toward a nuclear-free Korea by working closely with its allies Japan and South Korea as well as with its partners China and Russia. In Harrison's estimation, North Korea is quite ready to strike a grand bargain with the United States to stop its ambitious program of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, if the price is right. Whether North Korea is pursuing nuclear weapons as a bargaining chip, in exchange for a U.S. guarantee of the survival and independence of the regime, or as a deterrence to assure its defense and survival, however, cannot be settled once and for all. What matters in the international politics and diplomacy of the Korean endgame in the future, however, is more than a display of good will or morally praiseworthy gestures. Motives of good intentions, means of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems, the consequences of both failed and successful interactions in the Korean truce talks at Panmunjom, and historical memories of North Korea's ill-behavior of kidnapping, terrorism, the Pueblo seizure,
Korean Studies – University of Hawai'I Press
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.