Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
ment seem more relevant. Arguably, the end of the cold war, not electoral reform, opened up the foreign policy debate by destabilizing the previous equilibrium. Moreover, while foreign policy did not attract the interest of individual LDP politicians under the 1955 system, it was a major cleavage between the left and the right. Finally, the chapter on foreign policy relies extensively on examples from Koizumi Jun'ichiro's time in office. It is only ¯ now becoming clearer with several weaker prime ministers who have followed in Koizumi's footsteps that the powers of the prime minister might be more related to the individual in office than the actual rule changes put into place. Certainly the rule changes (the administrative reforms in the late 1990s and early 2000s more than electoral reform) have created the potential for greater prime ministerial leadership, but this has not always translated into an effective party leader able to devise a policy platform that even approaches the concerns of the median voter. Indeed, this deficiency could be related to a period of adjustment where politicians and parties are still learning how to adapt to the relatively new electoral system rules, but one should remain wary of
The Journal of Japanese Studies – Society for Japanese Studies
Published: Feb 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.