Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Since the early 1990s, the number of studies using neoclassical models to understand the Chinese economy has mushroomed. In this paper, we review two examples of estimation of the rate of technical progress and one attempt at modelling investment. We identify their shortcomings and the problems with the alleged policy implications. We show that econometric estimation of neoclassical models may result in apparently sensible results for misinformed reasons. We conclude that modelling the Chinese economy requires a deeper understanding of its inner workings as a transition and as a developing economy.
Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy – World Scientific Publishing Company
Published: Dec 1, 2011
Keywords: China identity investment neoclassical model total factor productivity growth
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.