232 Correspondence A typical example is the emergency management of a operating room. We therefore appreciate the thoughtful patient’s airway. We think that it is more important that it comments from Wilhelms et al. In the Scandinavian is managed competently, than who manages it. We would and German speaking countries, care of the critically ill like to see more productive collaboration between the and injured patients, whether in the ICU, the emergen- specialties, in which initiatives such as CREM could cy department (ED) or prehospital, is still very much serve as a common platform for development rather than in the hands of anaesthesiologists. In other parts of a statement of division. We support rotations between Europe, this is different. In addition, we fully agree specialties and common educational activities, such as that most patients in the ED are noncritical with high-ﬁdelity simulation. Rather than eschewing the op- different needs. We think that for such noncritical portunity that lies ahead, we think that the ESA, the patients both the single specialty based and the longi- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the tudinal emergency care systems may have their European Society for Emergency Medicine should have strengths and weaknesses.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Mar 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud