The Impact of Resident Involvement in Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion

The Impact of Resident Involvement in Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion Study Design.Retrospective study of prospectively collected dataObjective.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of resident surgeon involvement on patient outcomes following posterior cervical fusion (PCF) surgery.Summary of Background Data.Recently, there has been a significant uptrend in the number of PCF performed in the United States. Prior studies have investigated patient outcomes after cervical arthrodesis. Despite the heightened concern for patient safety and quality improvement, the data on the safety of resident participation in PCF is sparse.Methods.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was examined from 2005 to 2012. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to query the database for adults (≥18 years) who underwent PCF. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed on data adjusted by propensity scores to determine whether resident involvement was an independent predictor for the outcomes of interest.Results.A total of 448 cases were assessed in NSQIP. Less than half of these cases involved residents (224, 43.1%). Resident involvement was found to be a significant predictor for blood transfusions [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7, confidence interval (CI) = 1.1–2.6, P = 0.010], length of stay of more than 5 days (OR = 1.6, CI = 1.0–2.6, P = 0.040), and operative time more than 4 hours (OR = 3.6, CI = 1.7–7.4, P = 0.0007). Other independent risk factors for prolonged length of stay included age 81 years or older versus 50 years or younger (OR = 4.7, CI = 1.7–12.6, P = 0.016) and diabetes (OR = 2.3, CI = 1.3–4.1, P = 0.006). In addition, multifusion was identified as a significant risk factor for extended operative time (OR = 1.8, CI = 1.1–2.9, P = 0.023).Conclusion.The present study used a large, nationwide sample to assess the impact of resident involvement in PCF. Resident participation was not associated with mortality, but had a minimal association with morbidity.Level of Evidence: 3 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Spine Wolters Kluwer Health

The Impact of Resident Involvement in Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters_kluwer/the-impact-of-resident-involvement-in-elective-posterior-cervical-C2JXVWyT4e
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0362-2436
eISSN
1528-1159
D.O.I.
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001477
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Study Design.Retrospective study of prospectively collected dataObjective.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of resident surgeon involvement on patient outcomes following posterior cervical fusion (PCF) surgery.Summary of Background Data.Recently, there has been a significant uptrend in the number of PCF performed in the United States. Prior studies have investigated patient outcomes after cervical arthrodesis. Despite the heightened concern for patient safety and quality improvement, the data on the safety of resident participation in PCF is sparse.Methods.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was examined from 2005 to 2012. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to query the database for adults (≥18 years) who underwent PCF. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed on data adjusted by propensity scores to determine whether resident involvement was an independent predictor for the outcomes of interest.Results.A total of 448 cases were assessed in NSQIP. Less than half of these cases involved residents (224, 43.1%). Resident involvement was found to be a significant predictor for blood transfusions [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7, confidence interval (CI) = 1.1–2.6, P = 0.010], length of stay of more than 5 days (OR = 1.6, CI = 1.0–2.6, P = 0.040), and operative time more than 4 hours (OR = 3.6, CI = 1.7–7.4, P = 0.0007). Other independent risk factors for prolonged length of stay included age 81 years or older versus 50 years or younger (OR = 4.7, CI = 1.7–12.6, P = 0.016) and diabetes (OR = 2.3, CI = 1.3–4.1, P = 0.006). In addition, multifusion was identified as a significant risk factor for extended operative time (OR = 1.8, CI = 1.1–2.9, P = 0.023).Conclusion.The present study used a large, nationwide sample to assess the impact of resident involvement in PCF. Resident participation was not associated with mortality, but had a minimal association with morbidity.Level of Evidence: 3

Journal

SpineWolters Kluwer Health

Published: Mar 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off