EDITORIAL urrently peer reviewed journals are peppered languages, and may use quite different terms for C with so-called systematic reviews. However, the same concept. For example PubMed’s indexing on closer inspection it becomes obvious that the term for ‘‘heart attack’’ is ‘‘myocardial infarction’’, search strategies used to locate evidence for many whereas Embase uses the indexing term ‘‘heart of them are anything but systematic. Database search- infarction’’. A search suited to one database cannot ing is the initial investigative stage of any systematic simply be transferred to another. This example also review following the development of the protocol and demonstrates ignorance of the range of potential is analogous to laying the foundations of a building; fields that can be searched in many databases – titles however magnificent the architectural conception, if of articles, abstracts of articles, authors’ keywords, the foundations are not sound, the entire structure will and in some cases the full text of articles. Failure to be at risk, and although the foundations may be the specify a search field often means that the database’s most unexciting part of the project, they are crucial to algorithm generates bizarre results by interpreting the integrity of the building. My
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Feb 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud