AbstractRationale:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) are benign cystic tumors with a relevant risk of malignant transformation over time. Currently, follow-up after surgical resection of benign IPMNs remains controversial.Patient concerns:This is a case report of a 68-year-old male who underwent pancreatic head resection for a multicystic side-branch IPMN with low-grade epithelial dysplasia in March 2009 at the Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Germany.Diagnoses:During postoperative follow-up, a new solid, slightly hypodense lesion in the tail of the pancreas measuring 2.4 cm in diameter was diagnosed in July 2016. Preoperative staging revealed no signs of distant metastasis.Intervention:Subsequently, the patient underwent pancreatic tail resection including splenectomy. Histology revealed IPMN-associated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas pT3, pN1 (2/24), M0, R0.Outcomes:Patients with IPMN bare a relatively high overall risk of developing pancreatic cancer. The 5-year incidence has been described to be as high as 6.9%. The current Consensus-Guidelines therefore recommend a structural life-time follow-up. In contrast, in 2015 the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) explicitly states that follow-up is not recommended for resected benign IPMN. Currently, a general and international consensus is lacking.Lessons:The presented case demonstrates that even more than 5 years following resection of benign IPMN, pancreatic cancer can occur in a separate location of the pancreatic gland. We believe that IPMNs can be considered as indicator lesions for pancreatic cancer. Patients with resected side-branch IPMN should therefore undergo long term follow-up.
Medicine – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Feb 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud