Measuring MEDEVAC: Metrics for performance improvement

Measuring MEDEVAC: Metrics for performance improvement ABSTRACT Background The U.S. Army medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) community has maintained a reputation for high levels of success in transporting casualties from the point of injury to definitive care. This work served as a demonstration project in order to advance a model of quality assurance surveillance and medical direction for prehospital MEDEVAC providers within the Joint Trauma System. Methods A retrospective interrupted time-series analysis using prospectively collected data was performed as a process improvement project. Records were reviewed during two distinct time periods: 2009 and 2014-15. MEDEVAC records were matched to outcomes data available in the DoDTR. Abstracted de-identified data were reviewed for specific outcomes, procedures, and processes of care. Descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. Results A total of 1,008 patients were included in this study. Nine quality assurance metrics were assessed. These metrics were: airway management, management of hypoxemia, compliance with a blood transfusion protocol, interventions for hypotensive patients, quality of battlefield analgesia, temperature measurement and interventions, proportion of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with hypoxemia and/or hypotension, proportion of TBI patients with an appropriate assessment, and proportion of missing data. Overall survival in the subset of patients with outcomes data available in the DoDTR was 97.5%. Conclusions The data analyzed for this study suggests overall high compliance with established tactical combat casualty care guidelines. In the present study, nearly 7% of patients had at least one documented oxygen saturation of less than 90%, and 13% of these patients had no documentation of any intervention for hypoxemia, indicating a need for training focus on airway management for hypoxemia. Advances in battlefield analgesia continued to evolve over the period of time when data for this study was collected. Given the inherent high-risk, high-acuity nature of prehospital advanced life support and emphasis on the use of non-physician practitioners in an out-of-hospital setting, the need for ongoing medical oversight and quality improvement assessment is crucial. Level of Evidence Level IV. Study type Retrospective cohort. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters_kluwer/measuring-medevac-metrics-for-performance-improvement-ia0UQJ9YFg
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2163-0755
eISSN
2163-0763
D.O.I.
10.1097/TA.0000000000001715
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The U.S. Army medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) community has maintained a reputation for high levels of success in transporting casualties from the point of injury to definitive care. This work served as a demonstration project in order to advance a model of quality assurance surveillance and medical direction for prehospital MEDEVAC providers within the Joint Trauma System. Methods A retrospective interrupted time-series analysis using prospectively collected data was performed as a process improvement project. Records were reviewed during two distinct time periods: 2009 and 2014-15. MEDEVAC records were matched to outcomes data available in the DoDTR. Abstracted de-identified data were reviewed for specific outcomes, procedures, and processes of care. Descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. Results A total of 1,008 patients were included in this study. Nine quality assurance metrics were assessed. These metrics were: airway management, management of hypoxemia, compliance with a blood transfusion protocol, interventions for hypotensive patients, quality of battlefield analgesia, temperature measurement and interventions, proportion of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with hypoxemia and/or hypotension, proportion of TBI patients with an appropriate assessment, and proportion of missing data. Overall survival in the subset of patients with outcomes data available in the DoDTR was 97.5%. Conclusions The data analyzed for this study suggests overall high compliance with established tactical combat casualty care guidelines. In the present study, nearly 7% of patients had at least one documented oxygen saturation of less than 90%, and 13% of these patients had no documentation of any intervention for hypoxemia, indicating a need for training focus on airway management for hypoxemia. Advances in battlefield analgesia continued to evolve over the period of time when data for this study was collected. Given the inherent high-risk, high-acuity nature of prehospital advanced life support and emphasis on the use of non-physician practitioners in an out-of-hospital setting, the need for ongoing medical oversight and quality improvement assessment is crucial. Level of Evidence Level IV. Study type Retrospective cohort.

Journal

The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care SurgeryWolters Kluwer Health

Published: Apr 1, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off