Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2013)
Appraisal Of Guidelines For Research & Evaluation II: AGREE II Instrument
T. Wickizer, G. Franklin, J. Gluck, D. Fulton-Kehoe (2004)
Improving Quality Through Identifying Inappropriate Care: The Use of Guideline-Based Utilization Review Protocols in the Washington State Workers’ Compensation SystemJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46
(2017)
Technical Quality and Clinical Acceptability of a Utilisation Review Guideline for Occupational Conditions: ODG Treatment Guidelines by the Work Loss Data Institute
Dmitry Khodyakov, L. Mikesell, Ron Schraiber, M. Booth, E. Bromley (2016)
On using ethical principles of community-engaged research in translational science.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 171
B. Shea, Candyce Hamel, G. Wells, L. Bouter, E. Kristjansson, J. Grimshaw, David Henry, M. Boers (2009)
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62 10
M. Brouwers, M. Kho, G. Browman, J. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, Gene Feder, B. Fervers, Ian Graham, Steve Hanna, J. Makarski (2010)
Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support applicationCanadian Medical Association Journal, 182
A. Gagliardi, M. Brouwers (2015)
Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicabilityBMJ Open, 5
A. Tricco, N. Ivers, J. Grimshaw, D. Moher, Lucy Turner, J. Galipeau, Ilana Halperin, Brigitte Vachon, T. Ramsay, B. Manns, M. Tonelli, K. Shojania (2012)
Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 379
T. Wickizer, D. Lessler, G. Franklin (1999)
Controlling workers' compensation medical care use and costs through utilization management.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 41 8
Kathryn Fitch, Steven Bernstein, Marfa Aguilar, Bernard Burnand, Juan Lacalle (2001)
The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual
T. Nuckols, B. Wynn, Y. Lim, R. Shaw, S. Mattke, T. Wickizer, P. Harber, Peggy Wallace, S. Asch, C. MacLean, R. Garland (2005)
Evaluating Medical Treatment Guideline Sets for Injured Workers in California
T. Nuckols, Laura Anderson, Ioana Popescu, A. Diamant, Brian Doyle, P. Capua, R. Chou (2014)
Opioid Prescribing: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Chronic PainAnnals of Internal Medicine, 160
(2011)
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews
Adoption of the ODG Treatment Guidelines for Medical Necessity Determinations in Workers’ Comp: FAQ's
Ishita Sengupta, V. Reno, John Jr. (2008)
Workers' Compensation: Benefits, Coverage, and Costs, 2006HE: Cost Containment (Topic)
P. Shekelle, Eduardo Ortiz, S. Rhodes, S. Morton, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw, S. Woolf (2001)
Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated?JAMA, 286 12
M. Joosen, E. Brouwers, Karlijn Beurden, B. Terluin, J. Ruotsalainen, J. Woo, Kyeong-Sook Choi, H. Eguchi, J. Moriguchi, J. Klink, J. Weeghel (2014)
An international comparison of occupational health guidelines for the management of mental disorders and stress-related psychological symptomsOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 72
M. Brouwers, M. Kho, G. Browman, J. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, G. Feder, B. Fervers, I. Graham, J. Grimshaw, S. Hanna, P. Littlejohns, J. Makarski, L. Zitzelsberger (2010)
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCanadian Medical Association Journal, 182
K. Shojania, M. Sampson, M. Ansari, Jun Ji, S. Doucette, D. Moher (2007)
How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 147
Dan Hunt, J. Tower, Ryan Artuso, Jeffrey White, C. Bilinski, J. Rademacher, X. Tao, E. Bernacki (2016)
A New Method of Assessing the Impact of Evidence-Based Medicine on Claim OutcomesJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58
M. Brouwers, M. Kho, G. Browman, J. Burgers, F. Cluzeau, G. Feder, B. Fervers, I. Graham, S. Hanna, J. Makarski (2010)
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvementCanadian Medical Association Journal, 182
T. Wickizer, D. Lessler (2002)
Utilization management: issues, effects, and future prospects.Annual review of public health, 23
(1989)
Controlling Costs and Changing Patient Care?: the Role of Utilization Management
T. Nuckols, Y. Lim, B. Wynn, S. Mattke, C. MacLean, P. Harber, R. Brook, Peggy Wallace, R. Garland, S. Asch (2007)
Rigorous Development does not Ensure that Guidelines are Acceptable to a Panel of Knowledgeable ProvidersJournal of General Internal Medicine, 23
(2011)
Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust
C. Dewa, L. Trojanowski, M. Joosen, S. Bonato (2016)
Employer Best Practice Guidelines for the Return to Work of Workers on Mental Disorder–Related Disability LeaveThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61
M. Cabana, C. Rand, N. Powe, A. Wu, Modena Wilson, P. Abboud, H. Rubin (1999)
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.JAMA, 282 15
M. Lugtenberg, J. Burgers, G. Westert (2009)
Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic reviewQuality and Safety in Health Care, 18
Objective:The widely used Official Disability Guidelines (ODG®), a utilization review guideline for occupational conditions, has not been independently evaluated recently.Methods:We applied the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) and modified a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instruments to assess guideline development methods and the quality of supporting systematic reviews. Multidisciplinary experts rated the validity of clinical content for 47 topics.Results:The overall AGREE II score was 58% due to a combination of favorable attributes (breadth, clear recommendations, frequent updating, and application tools) and unfavorable attributes (scant input from workers and uncertainty about editorial independence). The modified AMSTAR rating was fair/good due to limited information on methods. Panelists rated clinical content as valid for 41 topics.Conclusions:ODG appears to be acceptable to clinicians, but ODG requires greater rigor to keep pace with methodological advances in the field of guideline development.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Mar 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.