ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of Armeo® robotic therapy, compared to conventional therapy, on upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Design Thirty children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy, with ages ranging from 6 to 8 years, were selected for this randomized controlled study and randomly assigned to two groups. The study group (n=15) received 12 weeks of Armeo robotic therapy (45 min/session, 3 days/week) and the control group (n=15) received conventional therapy for the same time period. The measured outcomes were the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention. Results Children in the study group showed significant improvement in the mean values of all the measured variables, compared to those in the control group (P < 0.05). Post-intervention MAS scores for the study and control groups were 1.6 (0.3) and 2 (0.5), respectively. Post-interventional QUEST total scores for the study and control groups were 84.6 (2.7) and 79.1 (2), respectively. Conclusions Armeo robotic therapy is significantly more effective than conventional therapy in improving the upper extremity quality of movement in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Sep 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud