Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Trustworthiness and Quality in Research for Clinical Application

Trustworthiness and Quality in Research for Clinical Application EDITOR’S MESSAGE Trustworthiness and Quality in Research for Clinical Application Mary Insana Fisher, PT, PhD Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Orthopedic Physical Therapy and Certified Lymphedema Therapist; Editor-in-Chief, Rehabilitation Oncology; and Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH In the last issue of Rehabilitation Oncology, I presented trials vs case reports) rather than the actual quality (or an updated journal policy requiring that systematic reviews bias) of the individual study. build recommendations using high-quality studies, under- As the rehabilitation science field continues to mature, standing that basing decisions on flawed research can, at the expectations regarding requirements for high-quality the very least, result in ineffective outcomes, but at the research have evolved over time. If anyone reads physi- worst, result in harm. The Editorial Board of Rehabilitation cal therapy scientific articles from the 1980s, they will see Oncology continues to evaluate our policies and proce- subpar reporting of research studies. These reports would dures, seeking to support publishing the best evidence for not make it through peer review today. We expect more rehabilitation clinicians who work with individuals diag- today, and there are 2 simple ways to ensure the research nosed with cancer. Part of ensuring that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Rehabilitation Oncology Wolters Kluwer Health

Trustworthiness and Quality in Research for Clinical Application

Fisher, Mary Insana
Rehabilitation Oncology , Volume 40 (3) – Jul 1, 2022
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/trustworthiness-and-quality-in-research-for-clinical-application-HFdegdzAYH

References (6)

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
© 2022 Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy, APTA.
ISSN
2168-3808
eISSN
2381-2427
DOI
10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000315
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

EDITOR’S MESSAGE Trustworthiness and Quality in Research for Clinical Application Mary Insana Fisher, PT, PhD Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Orthopedic Physical Therapy and Certified Lymphedema Therapist; Editor-in-Chief, Rehabilitation Oncology; and Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH In the last issue of Rehabilitation Oncology, I presented trials vs case reports) rather than the actual quality (or an updated journal policy requiring that systematic reviews bias) of the individual study. build recommendations using high-quality studies, under- As the rehabilitation science field continues to mature, standing that basing decisions on flawed research can, at the expectations regarding requirements for high-quality the very least, result in ineffective outcomes, but at the research have evolved over time. If anyone reads physi- worst, result in harm. The Editorial Board of Rehabilitation cal therapy scientific articles from the 1980s, they will see Oncology continues to evaluate our policies and proce- subpar reporting of research studies. These reports would dures, seeking to support publishing the best evidence for not make it through peer review today. We expect more rehabilitation clinicians who work with individuals diag- today, and there are 2 simple ways to ensure the research nosed with cancer. Part of ensuring that

Journal

Rehabilitation Oncology – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Jul 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.