Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Student and Faculty Views of Technology and Academic Success

Student and Faculty Views of Technology and Academic Success Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/neponline by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVA5KvPVPZ0P5BEgU+IUTEfzO/GUWifn2IfwcEVVH9SSn on 06/04/2020 Emerging Technologies Center Diane J. Skiba ince 2003, Educause Center for Research and Analysis (ECAR) Students’ experiences with wireless access to campus networks has been collecting data from undergraduate students about influenced their IT ratings. They were more satisfied if their wireless ac- S their information technology (IT) preferences and experiences. cess was good in the library, classrooms, public places, and the dor- ECAR has also collected data from faculty for the last three years. mitories. Brooks and Pomerantz (2017) explain the student wireless The 2017 undergraduate and faculty surveys collected similar data, experience in terms of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs; wireless is es- and “the reports can be read side by side, in tandem, or as a ‘call sentially equated with basic human needs. and response’ between students and their instructors” (Brooks & Where people sought technical support differed dramatically for Pomerantz, 2017). students and faculty. Each group was asked to identify their top three Here are the basic demographics for each survey: For the stu- resources. Faculty used the institutional IT helpdesk more often than dent survey, there were 43,559 participants from 124 institutions in students. They “prioritize sources of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nursing Education Perspectives Wolters Kluwer Health

Student and Faculty Views of Technology and Academic Success

Nursing Education Perspectives , Volume 39 (2) – Apr 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/student-and-faculty-views-of-technology-and-academic-success-d0zySKpo3o

References (2)

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
ISSN
1536-5026
eISSN
1943-4685
DOI
10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000296
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/neponline by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVA5KvPVPZ0P5BEgU+IUTEfzO/GUWifn2IfwcEVVH9SSn on 06/04/2020 Emerging Technologies Center Diane J. Skiba ince 2003, Educause Center for Research and Analysis (ECAR) Students’ experiences with wireless access to campus networks has been collecting data from undergraduate students about influenced their IT ratings. They were more satisfied if their wireless ac- S their information technology (IT) preferences and experiences. cess was good in the library, classrooms, public places, and the dor- ECAR has also collected data from faculty for the last three years. mitories. Brooks and Pomerantz (2017) explain the student wireless The 2017 undergraduate and faculty surveys collected similar data, experience in terms of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs; wireless is es- and “the reports can be read side by side, in tandem, or as a ‘call sentially equated with basic human needs. and response’ between students and their instructors” (Brooks & Where people sought technical support differed dramatically for Pomerantz, 2017). students and faculty. Each group was asked to identify their top three Here are the basic demographics for each survey: For the stu- resources. Faculty used the institutional IT helpdesk more often than dent survey, there were 43,559 participants from 124 institutions in students. They “prioritize sources of

Journal

Nursing Education PerspectivesWolters Kluwer Health

Published: Apr 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.