Purpose This study aimed to evaluate image quality of ultra-low dose chest computed tomography using 6 iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Method A lung phantom was scanned on 4 computed tomography scanners using fixed tube voltages and the lowest mAs available on each scanner, resulting in dose levels of 0.1 to 0.2 mGy (80 kVp) and 0.3 to 1 mGy (140 kVp) volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). Images were reconstructed with IR available on the scanners. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratios, contrast-to-noise ratios, uniformity, and noise power spectrum (NPS) were assessed for evaluation of image quality. Results Image quality parameters increased with increasing dose for all algorithms. At constant dose levels, model-based techniques improved the contrast-to-noise ratio of lesions more than the statistical algorithms. All algorithms tested at 0.1 mGy showed lower NPS peak frequencies compared with 0.39 mGy. In contrast to the statistical techniques, model-based algorithms showed lower NPS peak frequencies at the lowest doses, indicating a coarser and blotchier noise texture. Conclusion This study shows the importance of evaluating IR when introduced clinically.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Apr 1, 169
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera