IntroductionIn modern statistics, count data are conventionally analyzed by specifying a distributional assumption that implies a mean–variance relationship, typically done via generalized linear models (McCullagh and Nelder, ) and its various extensions. However, many applied researchers with little statistical training persist with the older approach of transforming data and fitting a linear model assuming equal variance. Indeed, transformation is the only method of dealing with heteroscedasticity that is taught in most introductory statistics courses, and is still occasionally advocated in the applied literature (Ives, ).A particular motivation for revisiting this issue is the analysis of multivariate abundance data in ecology (Warton et al., ) as in Table . Counts of the abundance of different taxonomic groups are recorded at different sites, and we are primarily interested in making simultaneous inferences across many taxonomic groups in a community, concerning the effect of some site treatment. A key property for the purpose of this article is that the response variable is discrete with many zeros, since not every taxon is observed at every site. While extensions of the generalized linear model have recently been proposed by several authors (Warton, ; Ovaskainen et al., ; Hui et al., ), the convention in
Biometrics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud