Summary 1 For most ecological assemblages, compiling complete inventories of species is difficult, if not impossible. Various methods have been developed to estimate total species richness based on the pattern of richness and relative abundance reflected in a limited sample. 2 We assessed the performance of a recently developed technique, the total‐species (T‐S) accumulation method, in estimating bird species richness for cloud forest reserves in north‐west Ecuador. This technique explicitly integrates the spatial heterogeneity of samples into the estimate of species richness for large areas by grouping samples into subsets based on shared environmental characteristics. 3 We compared the technique's performance with that of more traditional methods of species richness estimation: non‐parametric estimators and extrapolations from species‐accumulation curves. Existing bird species records for the Ecuadorian cloud forest reserves served as the independent measure of total species richness. 4 Non‐parametric estimators of species richness significantly underestimated total species richness. In contrast, extrapolation from the semi‐log approximation of T‐S curves, using subdivision by habitat type, altitude and first axis detrended correspondence analysis scores, overestimated total species richness, while extrapolation from null T‐S models and the standard species‐accumulation curve produced the most accurate results. 5 The T‐S method overestimated species richness for our ‘hyper‐diverse’ assemblage. This was probably because it adjusted the estimates upwards to account for beta‐diversity, when this diversity was already captured in the design of the site selection scheme. Nevertheless, it provided a quantitative measure of the beta‐diversity produced by environmental and compositional gradients. Moreover, our test indicated that factors such as sampling effort and species abundance distributions may be more important for accurate species richness estimation than heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of species. 6 Synthesis and applications. Our analysis demonstrates significant differences in the accuracy of different methods for estimating total species richness from a limited sample. Our work highlights the importance of knowing what an estimator is estimating so that when we characterize or compare sites, whether in ecological or conservation research, we do so with explicit knowledge of the potential biases in our chosen methodology.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2006
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera