Using spatial heterogeneity to extrapolate species richness: a new method tested on Ecuadorian cloud forest birds

Using spatial heterogeneity to extrapolate species richness: a new method tested on Ecuadorian... Summary 1 For most ecological assemblages, compiling complete inventories of species is difficult, if not impossible. Various methods have been developed to estimate total species richness based on the pattern of richness and relative abundance reflected in a limited sample. 2 We assessed the performance of a recently developed technique, the total‐species (T‐S) accumulation method, in estimating bird species richness for cloud forest reserves in north‐west Ecuador. This technique explicitly integrates the spatial heterogeneity of samples into the estimate of species richness for large areas by grouping samples into subsets based on shared environmental characteristics. 3 We compared the technique's performance with that of more traditional methods of species richness estimation: non‐parametric estimators and extrapolations from species‐accumulation curves. Existing bird species records for the Ecuadorian cloud forest reserves served as the independent measure of total species richness. 4 Non‐parametric estimators of species richness significantly underestimated total species richness. In contrast, extrapolation from the semi‐log approximation of T‐S curves, using subdivision by habitat type, altitude and first axis detrended correspondence analysis scores, overestimated total species richness, while extrapolation from null T‐S models and the standard species‐accumulation curve produced the most accurate results. 5 The T‐S method overestimated species richness for our ‘hyper‐diverse’ assemblage. This was probably because it adjusted the estimates upwards to account for beta‐diversity, when this diversity was already captured in the design of the site selection scheme. Nevertheless, it provided a quantitative measure of the beta‐diversity produced by environmental and compositional gradients. Moreover, our test indicated that factors such as sampling effort and species abundance distributions may be more important for accurate species richness estimation than heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of species. 6 Synthesis and applications. Our analysis demonstrates significant differences in the accuracy of different methods for estimating total species richness from a limited sample. Our work highlights the importance of knowing what an estimator is estimating so that when we characterize or compare sites, whether in ecological or conservation research, we do so with explicit knowledge of the potential biases in our chosen methodology. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Ecology Wiley

Using spatial heterogeneity to extrapolate species richness: a new method tested on Ecuadorian cloud forest birds

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/wiley/using-spatial-heterogeneity-to-extrapolate-species-richness-a-new-BJYd5u2lXr
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0021-8901
eISSN
1365-2664
D.O.I.
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01143.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary 1 For most ecological assemblages, compiling complete inventories of species is difficult, if not impossible. Various methods have been developed to estimate total species richness based on the pattern of richness and relative abundance reflected in a limited sample. 2 We assessed the performance of a recently developed technique, the total‐species (T‐S) accumulation method, in estimating bird species richness for cloud forest reserves in north‐west Ecuador. This technique explicitly integrates the spatial heterogeneity of samples into the estimate of species richness for large areas by grouping samples into subsets based on shared environmental characteristics. 3 We compared the technique's performance with that of more traditional methods of species richness estimation: non‐parametric estimators and extrapolations from species‐accumulation curves. Existing bird species records for the Ecuadorian cloud forest reserves served as the independent measure of total species richness. 4 Non‐parametric estimators of species richness significantly underestimated total species richness. In contrast, extrapolation from the semi‐log approximation of T‐S curves, using subdivision by habitat type, altitude and first axis detrended correspondence analysis scores, overestimated total species richness, while extrapolation from null T‐S models and the standard species‐accumulation curve produced the most accurate results. 5 The T‐S method overestimated species richness for our ‘hyper‐diverse’ assemblage. This was probably because it adjusted the estimates upwards to account for beta‐diversity, when this diversity was already captured in the design of the site selection scheme. Nevertheless, it provided a quantitative measure of the beta‐diversity produced by environmental and compositional gradients. Moreover, our test indicated that factors such as sampling effort and species abundance distributions may be more important for accurate species richness estimation than heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of species. 6 Synthesis and applications. Our analysis demonstrates significant differences in the accuracy of different methods for estimating total species richness from a limited sample. Our work highlights the importance of knowing what an estimator is estimating so that when we characterize or compare sites, whether in ecological or conservation research, we do so with explicit knowledge of the potential biases in our chosen methodology.

Journal

Journal of Applied EcologyWiley

Published: Feb 1, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off