Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Gudbjartsson, K. Jónasson, M. Frigge, A. Kong (2000)
Erratum to “MSX1 mutation is associated with orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis in humans”Nature Genetics, 25
A. Kong, D. Gudbjartsson, J. Sainz, G. Jónsdóttir, S. Gudjonsson, Bjorgvin Richardsson, Sigrun Sigurdardóttir, J. Barnard, B. Hallbeck, G. Másson, A. Shlien, S. Palsson, M. Frigge, T. Thorgeirsson, J. Gulcher, K. Stefánsson (2002)
A high-resolution recombination map of the human genomeNature Genetics, 31
A. Paterson, D. Naimark, A. Petronis (1999)
The Analysis of Parental Origin of Alleles May Detect Susceptibility Loci for Complex DisordersHuman Heredity, 49
E. Hauser (1998)
Methods for linkage analysis of complex genetic disease.
L. Kruglyak, M. Daly, Mary Reeve-Daly, E. Lander (1996)
Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach.American journal of human genetics, 58 6
Robert Lindsay, S. Kobes, W. Knowler, Peter Bennett, Robert Hanson (2001)
Genome-wide linkage analysis assessing parent-of-origin effects in the inheritance of type 2 diabetes and BMI in Pima Indians.Diabetes, 50 12
R. Burt (1986)
A cautionary noteSocial Networks, 8
X. Kong, Kevin Murphy, T. Raj, Chunsheng He, P. White, T. Matise (2004)
A combined linkage-physical map of the human genome.American journal of human genetics, 75 6
(1998)
Pediatrics and
R. Elston, James Stewart (1971)
A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.Human heredity, 21 6
R. Idury, R. Elston (1997)
A faster and more general hidden Markov model algorithm for multipoint likelihood calculations.Human heredity, 47 4
W. Robinson (1996)
The extent, mechanism, and consequences of genetic variation, for recombination rate.American journal of human genetics, 59 6
J. O’Connell, D. Weeks (1995)
The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set–recoding and fuzzy inheritanceNature Genetics, 11
A. Whittemore, J. Halpern (1994)
A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members.Biometrics, 50 1
Karl Pfeifer (2000)
Mechanisms of genomic imprinting.American journal of human genetics, 67 4
H. Mohrenweiser, Susan Tsujimoto, Laurie Gordon, Anne Olsen (1998)
Regions of sex-specific hypo- and hyper-recombination identified through integration of 180 genetic markers into the metric physical map of human chromosome 19.Genomics, 47 2
S. Shete, C. Amos (2002)
Testing for genetic linkage in families by a variance-components approach in the presence of genomic imprinting.American journal of human genetics, 70 3
L. Kruglyak, E. Lander (1998)
Faster Multipoint Linkage Analysis Using Fourier TransformsJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 5 1
J. Haldane (1919)
The probable errors of calculated linkage values, and the most accurate method of determining gametic from certain zygotic seriesJournal of Genetics, 8
E. Sobel, K. Lange (1996)
Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics.American journal of human genetics, 58 6
H. Donis-Keller (1992)
A comprehensive genetic linkage map of the human genome. NIH/CEPH Collaborative Mapping Group.Science, 258 5079
(2005)
Variation in the P2-promoter region of hepatocyte nuclear factor-4A (HNF4A) is associated with b-cell function
G. Lathrop, J. Lalouel, C. Julier, J. Ott (1984)
Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 81 11
E. Lander, P. Green (1987)
Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84 8
E. Daw, E. Thompson, E. Wijsman (2000)
Bias in multipoint linkage analysis arising from map misspecificationGenetic Epidemiology, 19
S. Heath (1997)
Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models.American journal of human genetics, 61 3
(1999)
The ASPEX package: affected sib-pair mapping
G. Abecasis, S. Cherny, W. Cookson, L. Cardon (2002)
Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow treesNature Genetics, 30
A. Schäffer (1996)
Faster linkage analysis computations for pedigrees with loops or unused alleles.Human heredity, 46 4
N. Morton, C. Maclean, R. Lew, S. Yee (1986)
Multipoint linkage analysis.American journal of human genetics, 38 6
A. Kong, A. Kong, N. Cox (1997)
Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests.American journal of human genetics, 61 5
R. Straub, M. Speer, Y. Luo, K. Rojas, J. Overhauser, J. Ott, T. Gilliam (1993)
A microsatellite genetic linkage map of human chromosome 18.Genomics, 15 1
Robert Hanson, S. Kobes, Robert Lindsay, W. Knowler (2001)
Assessment of parent-of-origin effects in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.American journal of human genetics, 68 4
Nicolas Produit, Rolf Fimmers, Thorsten Kurz, K. Deichmann, T. Wienker, Max Baur (2000)
Parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus-trait models: application to mite sensitization.American journal of human genetics, 66 6
J. Halpern, A. Whittemore (1999)
Multipoint linkage analysis. A cautionary note.Human heredity, 49 4
A. Páldi, G. Gyapay, J. Jami (1995)
Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome display sex-specific meiotic recombination frequenciesCurrent Biology, 5
(1919)
The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors
The ratio of male and female genetic map distances varies dramatically across the human genome. Despite these sex differences in genetic map distances, most multipoint linkage analyses use sex‐averaged genetic maps. We investigated the impact of using a sex‐averaged genetic map instead of sex‐specific maps for multipoint linkage analysis of affected sibling pairs when identity‐by‐descent states are incompletely known due to missing parental genotypes and incomplete marker heterozygosity. If either all or no parental genotypes were available, for intermarker distances of 10, 5, and 1 cM, we found no important differences in the expected maximum lod score (EMLOD) or location estimates of the disease locus between analyses that used the sex‐averaged map and those that used the true sex‐specific maps for female:male genetic map distance ratios 1:10 and 10:1. However, when genotypes for only one parent were available and the recombination rate was higher in females, the EMLOD using the sex‐averaged map was inflated compared to the sex‐specific map analysis if only mothers were genotyped and deflated if only fathers were genotyped. The inflation of the lod score when only mothers were genotyped led to markedly increased false‐positive rates in some cases. The opposite was true when the recombination rate was higher in males; the EMLOD was inflated if only fathers were genotyped, and deflated if only mothers were genotyped. While the effects of missing parental genotypes were mitigated for less extreme cases of missingness, our results suggest that when possible, sex‐specific maps should be used in linkage analyses. Genet. Epidemiol. 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Genetic Epidemiology – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2006
Keywords: sex‐specific maps; linkage analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.