Aim To offer an objective approach to some of the problems associated with the development of logistic regression models: how to compare different models, determination of sample size adequacy, the influence of the ratio of positive to negative cells on model accuracy, and the appropriate scale at which the hypothesis of a non‐random distribution should be tested. Location Test data were taken from Southern Africa. Methods The approach relies mainly on the use of the AUC (Area under the Curve) statistic, based on ROC (threshold Receiver Operating Characteristic) plots, for between‐model comparisons. Data for the distribution of the bont tick Amblyomma hebraeum Koch (Acari: Ixodidae) are used to illustrate the methods. Results Methods for the estimation of minimum sample sizes and more accurate hypothesis‐testing are outlined. Logistic regression is robust to the assumption that uncollected cells can be scored as negative, provided that the sample size of cells scored as positive is adequate. The variation in temperature and rainfall at localities where A. hebraeum has been collected is significantly lower than expected from a random sample of points across the data set, suggesting that within‐site variation may be an important determinant of its distribution. Main conclusions Between‐model comparisons relying on AUCs can be used to enhance objectivity in the development and refinement of logistic regression models. Both between‐site and within‐site variability should be considered as potentially important factors determining species distributions.
Journal of Biogeography – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2000
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera