Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ludovica Gambaro (2017)
Who is minding the kids? New developments and lost opportunities in reforming the British early education workforceJournal of European Social Policy, 27
B. Taggart (2004)
EDITORIAL Early years education and care: three agendasBritish Educational Research Journal, 30
Hannah Germany, Yvonne Anders, Yvonne Germany, P. Leseman, Hannah Ulferts, A. Sušac, P. Slot, M. Broekhuizen (2016)
economic benefits D 4 . 2 : Effects of ECEC on academic outcomes in literacy and mathematics : Meta-analysis of European longitudinal studies
S. Mathers, R. Smees (2014)
Quality and inequality: Do three‐ and four‐year‐olds in deprived areas experience lower quality early years provision?
(2002)
Delivering for children and families: Inter-departmental childcare review
J. Blanden, E. Bono, S. Mcnally, B. Rabe (2015)
Universal Pre�?School Education: The Case of Public Funding with Private ProvisionLabor: Human Capital eJournal
S. Ball, Carol Vincent (2005)
The ‘childcare champion’? New Labour, social justice and the childcare marketThe Routledge Reader in Early Childhood Education
Ludovica Gambaro, K. Stewart, J. Waldfogel (2015)
A Question of Quality: Do Children from Disadvantaged Backgrounds Receive Lower Quality Early Childhood Education and Care?.British Educational Research Journal, 41
C. Tickell (2011)
The early years: Foundations for life, health and learning
S. Strand (1999)
Ethnic Group, Sex and Economic Disadvantage: associations with pupils' educational progress from Baseline to the end of Key Stage 1British Educational Research Journal, 25
Strategy Unit (2002)
Delivering for children and families: Inter‐departmental childcare review, November
(2011)
The English indices of deprivation 2010
(2017)
Time for change: An assessment of government policies on social mobility 1997–2007
K. Stewart (2013)
Labour's Record on the Under Fives: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
Claire Crawford, L. Dearden, E. Greaves (2013)
When you are born matters : evidence for England : IFS report R80
(2015)
The impact of children's centres: Studying the effects of children's centres in promoting better outcomes for young children and their families
K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj‐Blatchford, B. Taggart (2004)
The Effective Provision of Pre‐school Education (EPPE) project: Findings from pre‐school to end of key stage 1
K. Stewart, P. Obolenskaya (2015)
The Coalition's Record on the Under Fives: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 2010-2015
Linda Mitchell, Patricia Meagher-Lundberg (2017)
Brokering to Support Participation of Disadvantaged Families in Early Childhood Education.British Educational Research Journal, 43
A. Bell, N. Finch, I. Valle, R. Sainsbury, C. Skinner (2005)
A question of balance: Lone parents, childcare and work
(2016)
Provision for children under 5 years of age. Statistical First Release SFR 23/1016 (London, Department for Education)
Graham Hobbs, A. Vignoles (2010)
Is children’s free school meal ‘eligibility’ a good proxy for family income?British Educational Research Journal, 36
S. Speight, R. Smith, C. Coshall, E. Lloyd (2010)
Towards universal early years provision: analysis of take-up by disadvantaged families from recent annual childcare surveys
(2011)
The English indices of deprivation 2010 (London, Department for Communities and Local Government)
(2011)
The early years: Foundations for life, health and learning. An independent report on the Early Years Foundation Stage toHerMajesty’sGovernment (London, The StationeryOffice)
(2004)
The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) project: Findings from pre-school to end of key stage 1 (Nottingham, Department for Education and Skills)
C. Owen, P. Moss (1989)
Patterns of preschool provision in English local authorities 1Journal of Education Policy, 4
(2016)
Entitlement to free early education and childcare
(2014)
Quality and inequality: Do three- and four-year-olds in deprived areas
C. Crawford, L. Dearden, E. Greaves (2013)
When you are born matters: Evidence for England
Philip Noden, A. West (2016)
The early years single funding formula: national policy and local implementation
S. Mathers, K. Sylva, H. Joshi, K. Hansen, I. Plewis, Jon Johnson, Anitha George, Faye Linskey, Yvonne Grabbe (2007)
Quality of childcare settings in the Millennium Cohort Study
B. Taggart (2004)
Early years education and care: Three agendas, 30
K. Roberts (2008)
Understanding attitudes to childcare and childcare language among low-income parents
(2006)
Ethnicity and education : The evidence on minority ethnic pupils aged 5 – 16
S. Strand, L. Malmberg, James Hall (2015)
English as an Additional Language (EAL) and educational achievement in England: An analysis of the National Pupil Database
(1997)
Time for change: An assessment of government policies on social mobility
(2016)
Provision for children under 5 years of age
For over a decade, all three‐year‐olds in England have been entitled to a free part‐time early education place. One aim of this policy is to close developmental gaps between higher‐income and low‐income children. However, the success of the initiative depends on children accessing the places. Using the National Pupil Database, we examine all autumn‐born four‐year‐olds attending in January 2011, and ask whether they started attending when first eligible, in January 2010. One in five children did not access their free place from the beginning, and the proportion is much higher among children from families with persistently low incomes. We also find differences by ethnicity and home language, but these factors explain only a small share of the income gradient. We go on to explore associations between non‐take‐up and local area factors. In areas with higher child poverty rates, take‐up is lower overall, but the gap between low‐income and other families is smaller. There are also various associations between take‐up and local proportions of different provider types (maintained, private, voluntary, Sure Start). In particular, the voluntary sector seems to have more flexibility than maintained provision to offer places in January, and more success than private providers in reaching children from lower‐income backgrounds. The analysis also highlights how take‐up overall is relatively high and the gap by income level is smaller in areas with more Sure Start provision. This suggests that aspects of Sure Start facilitated access among low‐income families, and could perhaps be replicated as implementation of the free entitlement continues to be expanded.
British Educational Research Journal – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.