The terrestrial biosphere is one of several key components of the global carbon cycle. Because the mechanisms by which climate determines terrestrial biosphere carbon fluxes are not well understood, significant uncertainties concerning model results exist even for the current state of the system, with important consequences for our ability to predict changes under future climate change scenarios. We assess how far this uncertainty can be reduced by constraining a global mechanistic model of vegetation activity, either with global satellite‐derived vegetation index data or with measurements of the seasonal CO2 cycle in the atmosphere. We first show how constraining the model with satellite data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration advanced very high resolution radiometer reduces the sensitivity to estimated uncertainties in model parameters, and thus the estimated error range of net primary productivity. Regionally, the satellite data deliver the largest constraint for vegetation activity in boreal and arctic as well as in tropical water‐limited environments. In a second analysis through an atmospheric tracer transport model, we check the consistency of those results with the measured seasonal cycle of CO2 at various remote monitoring sites. While before including the satellite data into model calculations, some simulations within the error range lead to a CO2 seasonal cycle outside the observations, there is a good agreement with the additional constraint. The conclusion is that the constraint delivered by the satellite data is at least as significant as that delivered by atmospheric CO2 measurements. We also show that the CO2 data mainly reflect the activity of northern vegetation, in particular conifers and C3 grasses. This suggests that satellite measurements provide the most useful global data currently available for checking and improving terrestrial vegetation models and that consistency with CO2 measurements is a necessary but not a sufficient requirement for their realism.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2001
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera