Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Thomas, R. Williamson, J. Davies, A. Webb (1982)
The clinical syndrome of mammary duct ectasiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 69
B. Rees, I. Gravelle, L. Hughes (1977)
Nipple retraction in duct ectasiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 64
S. Robins (1972)
Diseases of the Breast, Ed. 2, Cushman D. Haagensen. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia (1971), 578 Illustrations, 829 pages. $35.00Human Pathology, 3
J. Dixon, T. Anderson, A. Lumsden, R. Elton, M. Roberts, A. Forrest (1983)
Mammary duct ectasiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 70
(1979)
JG: Problems in breast pathology
D. Kopans (1987)
Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques: current status and future developments.Radiologic clinics of North America, 25 5
B. Threatt, H. Appelman (1973)
Mammary duct injection.Radiology, 108 1
Thomas Thomas, Williamson Williamson, Davies Davies (1982)
The clinical syndrome of breast duct ectasiaBr J Surg, 69
S. Feig (1989)
The role of ultrasound in a breast imaging center.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 10 2
Luigi Matricardi, MD, and Roberta Lovati, M D Mammary duct ectasia is a common benign breast disease. It is also referred to as periductal mastitis, varicocele tumor, or granulomatous mastitis. It was first identified in 1923 by Bloodgood, who described it as a lesion with a âclinical picture of dilated ducts beneath the nipple frequently to be palped as a doughy worm-like mass.ââ About 30 years later, Haagensen used the phrase âmammary duct ectasia,â which at present is the most common name for the disease.â The diagnosis of mammary ectasia in clinical practice is important to increase our so far limited knowledge of its etiology and pathogenes ~ s ,and ~ differentiate it from other benign ~ . to and malignant diseases that may resemble this lesion in its clinical and pathological picture. The diagnosis is often difficult due to the different clinical and pathological features with which it can be associated.1,3,4 According to recent autopsy reports, the disease occurs in 30%t o 40% of women more than 50 years of age.3 In clinical practice, however, it is often misdiagnosed, not being distinguished from other breast diseases, so it is difficult to assess its clinical frequency correctly. The
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.