Objective: To compare selected effects of tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns and their mothers’ ratings of pleasure and confidence with the bath. Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: The maternity unit of an eastern Canadian hospital. Participants: One hundred two mother‐baby pairs were randomly assigned to an experimental tub bath or a sponge bath control group. Interventions: Fifty‐one newborns were tub bathed and 51 sponge bathed according to the study protocols for their initial and one additional bath. Main Outcome Measures: (a) Newborn temperature stability was assessed by recording axillary temperatures pre‐ and postbath, (b) umbilical cord healing was identified by daily observations and infection control surveillance, (c) infant contentment was quantified by applying the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, and (d) maternal pleasure with the bath and confidence with bathing at discharge were self‐rated on a 5‐point scale. Results: Tub‐bathed babies experienced significantly less temperature loss (t = 4.79, p = .00) and were significantly more content (t =−6.48, p = .00) than were those who were sponge bathed. No differences in cord healing scores were found. Mothers of tub bathed babies rated their pleasure with the bath significantly higher than did mothers of sponge bathed babies (t = 4.15, p = .00). No differences in maternal confidence were noted. Conclusions: Tub bathing is a safe and pleasurable alternative to sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns.
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2004
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud