Tub Bathing Versus Traditional Sponge Bathing for the Newborn

Tub Bathing Versus Traditional Sponge Bathing for the Newborn Objective: To compare selected effects of tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns and their mothers’ ratings of pleasure and confidence with the bath. Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: The maternity unit of an eastern Canadian hospital. Participants: One hundred two mother‐baby pairs were randomly assigned to an experimental tub bath or a sponge bath control group. Interventions: Fifty‐one newborns were tub bathed and 51 sponge bathed according to the study protocols for their initial and one additional bath. Main Outcome Measures: (a) Newborn temperature stability was assessed by recording axillary temperatures pre‐ and postbath, (b) umbilical cord healing was identified by daily observations and infection control surveillance, (c) infant contentment was quantified by applying the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, and (d) maternal pleasure with the bath and confidence with bathing at discharge were self‐rated on a 5‐point scale. Results: Tub‐bathed babies experienced significantly less temperature loss (t = 4.79, p = .00) and were significantly more content (t =−6.48, p = .00) than were those who were sponge bathed. No differences in cord healing scores were found. Mothers of tub bathed babies rated their pleasure with the bath significantly higher than did mothers of sponge bathed babies (t = 4.15, p = .00). No differences in maternal confidence were noted. Conclusions: Tub bathing is a safe and pleasurable alternative to sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing Wiley

Tub Bathing Versus Traditional Sponge Bathing for the Newborn

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/tub-bathing-versus-traditional-sponge-bathing-for-the-newborn-xoCnjfsSG0
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0884-2175
eISSN
1552-6909
D.O.I.
10.1177/0884217504270651
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Objective: To compare selected effects of tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns and their mothers’ ratings of pleasure and confidence with the bath. Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: The maternity unit of an eastern Canadian hospital. Participants: One hundred two mother‐baby pairs were randomly assigned to an experimental tub bath or a sponge bath control group. Interventions: Fifty‐one newborns were tub bathed and 51 sponge bathed according to the study protocols for their initial and one additional bath. Main Outcome Measures: (a) Newborn temperature stability was assessed by recording axillary temperatures pre‐ and postbath, (b) umbilical cord healing was identified by daily observations and infection control surveillance, (c) infant contentment was quantified by applying the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, and (d) maternal pleasure with the bath and confidence with bathing at discharge were self‐rated on a 5‐point scale. Results: Tub‐bathed babies experienced significantly less temperature loss (t = 4.79, p = .00) and were significantly more content (t =−6.48, p = .00) than were those who were sponge bathed. No differences in cord healing scores were found. Mothers of tub bathed babies rated their pleasure with the bath significantly higher than did mothers of sponge bathed babies (t = 4.15, p = .00). No differences in maternal confidence were noted. Conclusions: Tub bathing is a safe and pleasurable alternative to sponge bathing in healthy, term newborns.

Journal

Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal NursingWiley

Published: Nov 1, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off