Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Austin, J. Pausas, A. Nicholls (1996)
Patterns of tree species richness in relation to environment in southeastern New South Wales, AustraliaAustral Ecology, 21
Minchin Minchin (1989)
Montane vegetation of the Mt. Field Massif, Tasmania: a test of some hypotheses about properties of community patternsVegetatio, 83
J. Huisman, H. Olff, L. Fresco (1993)
A hierarchical set of models for species response analysisJournal of Vegetation Science, 4
M. Austin (1987)
Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmental gradientsPlant Ecology, 69
M. Austin, M. Gaywood (1994)
Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theoryJournal of Vegetation Science, 5
Austin Austin (1976)
On non‐linear species response models in ordinationVegetatio, 33
Austin Austin, Smith Smith (1989)
A new model for the continuum conceptVegetatio, 83
M. Austin, A. Nicholls, M. Doherty, Jacqui Meyers (1994)
Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β‐functionJournal of Vegetation Science, 5
M. Austin, Jacqui Meyers (1996)
Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversityForest Ecology and Management, 85
Minchin Minchin (1987)
Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive modelVegetatio, 71
J. Oksanen (1997)
Why the beta-function cannot be used to estimate skewness of species responsesJournal of Vegetation Science, 8
M. Austin, A. Nicholls, C. Margules (1990)
Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus speciesEcological Monographs, 60
Abstract. We respond to Oksanen's recent comments in “Why the beta‐function cannot be used to estimate skewness of species responses”. We agree with Oksanen's criticisms concerning correlated parameters when fitting beta‐functions. We argue that response functions can be reasonably estimated using beta‐functions only for those species whose range limits obviously fall within the observed length of an environmental gradient and our original description included explicit recognition of this need. The simulated data used by Oksanen contains only one species that would meet our criteria for defining the limits and the shape of this species is recovered by fitting a beta‐function. Beta‐functions are shown to recover reasonable approximations of the true shapes when fitted to simulated data, generated without error, and representing species with either skewed or symmetrical response shapes if using realistic estimates of the species limits. When arbitrary limits are imposed then distorted shapes result. Using similar data from 500 simulated data sets generated under the assumption of a Poisson error structure, beta‐functions gave conservative estimates of the degree of skewness for those data sets representing skewed species and no evidence of skewness for those data sets representing symmetrical species. We conclude that despite Oksanen's concerns the conclusions drawn by the current authors and colleagues with respect to the degree of skewness shown by species response functions along a common gradient are robust to the fitting procedures used. While we agree that the fitting of beta‐functions is not the best approach to modelling skewed responses we argue that it will not mislead the user as to the presence or extent of skewness if used with reasonable and data driven estimates of the species limits.
Journal of Vegetation Science – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.