To fix or not to fix the species limits, that is the ecological question: Response to Jari Oksanen

To fix or not to fix the species limits, that is the ecological question: Response to Jari Oksanen Abstract. We respond to Oksanen's recent comments in “Why the beta‐function cannot be used to estimate skewness of species responses”. We agree with Oksanen's criticisms concerning correlated parameters when fitting beta‐functions. We argue that response functions can be reasonably estimated using beta‐functions only for those species whose range limits obviously fall within the observed length of an environmental gradient and our original description included explicit recognition of this need. The simulated data used by Oksanen contains only one species that would meet our criteria for defining the limits and the shape of this species is recovered by fitting a beta‐function. Beta‐functions are shown to recover reasonable approximations of the true shapes when fitted to simulated data, generated without error, and representing species with either skewed or symmetrical response shapes if using realistic estimates of the species limits. When arbitrary limits are imposed then distorted shapes result. Using similar data from 500 simulated data sets generated under the assumption of a Poisson error structure, beta‐functions gave conservative estimates of the degree of skewness for those data sets representing skewed species and no evidence of skewness for those data sets representing symmetrical species. We conclude that despite Oksanen's concerns the conclusions drawn by the current authors and colleagues with respect to the degree of skewness shown by species response functions along a common gradient are robust to the fitting procedures used. While we agree that the fitting of beta‐functions is not the best approach to modelling skewed responses we argue that it will not mislead the user as to the presence or extent of skewness if used with reasonable and data driven estimates of the species limits. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Vegetation Science Wiley

To fix or not to fix the species limits, that is the ecological question: Response to Jari Oksanen

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/to-fix-or-not-to-fix-the-species-limits-that-is-the-ecological-n7nC7tdZ6M
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1997 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science
ISSN
1100-9233
eISSN
1654-1103
D.O.I.
10.2307/3237380
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract. We respond to Oksanen's recent comments in “Why the beta‐function cannot be used to estimate skewness of species responses”. We agree with Oksanen's criticisms concerning correlated parameters when fitting beta‐functions. We argue that response functions can be reasonably estimated using beta‐functions only for those species whose range limits obviously fall within the observed length of an environmental gradient and our original description included explicit recognition of this need. The simulated data used by Oksanen contains only one species that would meet our criteria for defining the limits and the shape of this species is recovered by fitting a beta‐function. Beta‐functions are shown to recover reasonable approximations of the true shapes when fitted to simulated data, generated without error, and representing species with either skewed or symmetrical response shapes if using realistic estimates of the species limits. When arbitrary limits are imposed then distorted shapes result. Using similar data from 500 simulated data sets generated under the assumption of a Poisson error structure, beta‐functions gave conservative estimates of the degree of skewness for those data sets representing skewed species and no evidence of skewness for those data sets representing symmetrical species. We conclude that despite Oksanen's concerns the conclusions drawn by the current authors and colleagues with respect to the degree of skewness shown by species response functions along a common gradient are robust to the fitting procedures used. While we agree that the fitting of beta‐functions is not the best approach to modelling skewed responses we argue that it will not mislead the user as to the presence or extent of skewness if used with reasonable and data driven estimates of the species limits.

Journal

Journal of Vegetation ScienceWiley

Published: Oct 1, 1997

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off