RICE UNIVERSITY In recent years a considerable number of studies have been published that purport to measure the welfare costs of monopolies and tariffs.â The results have uniformly shown very small costs for practices that economists normally deplore. This led Mundell to comment in 1962 that âUnless there is a thorough theoretical re-examination of the validity of the tools upon which these studies are founded . . . someone will inevitably draw the conclusion that economics has ceased to be important.ââ Judging from conversations with graduate students, a number of younger economists are in fact drawing the conclusion that tariffs and monopolies are not of much importance. This view is now beginning to appear in the literature. On the basis of these measurements Professor Harvey Leibenstein has argued âMicroeconomic theory focuses on allocative efKciency to the exclusion of other types of efiiaencies that, in fact, are much more significant in many instances.ââ It is my purpose to take the other route suggested by Mundell and demonstrate that the âtools on which these studies are foundedâ produce an underestimation of the welfare costs of taras and monopolies. The classical economists were not concerning themselves with trifles when they argued
Economic Inquiry – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1967
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera