Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Voice of Experience: How Social Scientists Communicate Family Research to Policymakers

The Voice of Experience: How Social Scientists Communicate Family Research to Policymakers Because scientific understanding of communicating family research to policymakers is incomplete, qualitative interviews were conducted with social scientists experienced in bridging the gulf between research and family policy. In keeping with the tenets of 2 communities and community dissonance theories, the underutilization of research in policymaking was attributed, in part, to misperceptions and miscommunication between researchers and policymakers who operate in different cultures. Social scientists identified cultural barriers they encountered and rewards they experienced when communicating research to policymakers. Ten recommendations detail pragmatic strategies for communicating across conflicting cultures to promote greater use of research in family policy decisions. The findings suggest a paradigm shift away from simply disseminating research to policymakers and toward developing collaborative relationships with them. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Relations Wiley

The Voice of Experience: How Social Scientists Communicate Family Research to Policymakers

Family Relations , Volume 58 (2) – Apr 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-voice-of-experience-how-social-scientists-communicate-family-Ub54c8D0lI

References (33)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2009 by the National Council on Family Relations
ISSN
0197-6664
eISSN
1741-3729
DOI
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00549.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Because scientific understanding of communicating family research to policymakers is incomplete, qualitative interviews were conducted with social scientists experienced in bridging the gulf between research and family policy. In keeping with the tenets of 2 communities and community dissonance theories, the underutilization of research in policymaking was attributed, in part, to misperceptions and miscommunication between researchers and policymakers who operate in different cultures. Social scientists identified cultural barriers they encountered and rewards they experienced when communicating research to policymakers. Ten recommendations detail pragmatic strategies for communicating across conflicting cultures to promote greater use of research in family policy decisions. The findings suggest a paradigm shift away from simply disseminating research to policymakers and toward developing collaborative relationships with them.

Journal

Family RelationsWiley

Published: Apr 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.