The poverty of professionalization: a critical analysis of strategies for the occupational advancement of nursing

The poverty of professionalization: a critical analysis of strategies for the occupational... The purpose of this paper is to evaluate critically the strategies of occupational advancement used by nurses It is noted that these are frequently framed within the paradigm of professionalization However, despite the ubiquity of its use, it is argued that this model is inappropriate Specific strategies are examined Attempts to appropriate the title of profession by demonstrating that nursing possesses the relevant attributes are dismissed as rhetorical exercises The rise of managerialism, despite being cloaked in the guise of professionalism, is seen as anti‐professional because it restricts the autonomy of individual practitioners Clinical ‘professionalization’ is also regarded as problematic because it does not fit with the definition of a professional as an autonomous practitioner Examination of patient advocacy, and of attempts to validate nursing diagnosis, demonstrate that the occupational advancement of clinical nurses is increasingly dependent upon the co‐operation of health care consumers This dependence is incompatible with the prescriptive powers and exclusive knowledge that are claimed by traditional professions It is concluded that nurses should abandon the ideology of professionalization and concentrate on the more pertinent issue of maximizing the efficacy of the occupation http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Advanced Nursing Wiley

The poverty of professionalization: a critical analysis of strategies for the occupational advancement of nursing

Journal of Advanced Nursing, Volume 17 (6) – Jun 1, 1992

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-poverty-of-professionalization-a-critical-analysis-of-strategies-kPPskXdwxH
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0309-2402
eISSN
1365-2648
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01970.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate critically the strategies of occupational advancement used by nurses It is noted that these are frequently framed within the paradigm of professionalization However, despite the ubiquity of its use, it is argued that this model is inappropriate Specific strategies are examined Attempts to appropriate the title of profession by demonstrating that nursing possesses the relevant attributes are dismissed as rhetorical exercises The rise of managerialism, despite being cloaked in the guise of professionalism, is seen as anti‐professional because it restricts the autonomy of individual practitioners Clinical ‘professionalization’ is also regarded as problematic because it does not fit with the definition of a professional as an autonomous practitioner Examination of patient advocacy, and of attempts to validate nursing diagnosis, demonstrate that the occupational advancement of clinical nurses is increasingly dependent upon the co‐operation of health care consumers This dependence is incompatible with the prescriptive powers and exclusive knowledge that are claimed by traditional professions It is concluded that nurses should abandon the ideology of professionalization and concentrate on the more pertinent issue of maximizing the efficacy of the occupation

Journal

Journal of Advanced NursingWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1992

References

  • The development of professional and political awareness in nursing
    Dean, Dean
  • quoted in
    Ralph, Ralph

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month