Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Literature in Political Anthropology suggests that cities can be into two alternative models in accord with their chief functions: (1) industrially geared, production‐oriented municipalities that rest within vertically constructed, administratively demarcated, and managed hierarchies of power; and (2) urban places that are focused on commercial interchange aimed at filling consumption needs, and mat find their spheres of activity best articulated within what are principally horizontally interconnected webs populated by similar localities or supralocal institutions governed by market relations. Since 1980, China has been attempting to reorient large, centrally located cities away from their exclusive concern with production and to free mem from hierarchical relations. Despite reforms granting financial authority to cities, expanding their ability to form ties with their hinterlands and within their greater economic regions, the continuing power of the provinces has sharply limited ability of cities to break free of the vertically structured power relationships that have bound them for decades, (hierarchy, network, economic region, hinterland, administrative relationships)
City & Society – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.