Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Social and Demographic Trends
J. Snyder, S. Levitt (1995)
Political Parties and the Distribution of federal OutlaysAmerican Journal of Political Science, 39
Scott Ashworth (2005)
Reputational Dynamics and Political CareersJournal of Law Economics & Organization, 21
L. Huddy, Nayda Terkildsen (1993)
Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female CandidatesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 37
Eric Smith, R. Fox (2001)
The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for CongressPolitical Research Quarterly, 54
J. Fowler (2006)
Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship NetworksPolitical Analysis, 14
Kenneth Bickers, R. Stein (1996)
The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork BarrelAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
T. Groseclose, Charles Stewart (1998)
The Value of Committee Seats in the House, 1947-91American Journal of Political Science, 42
Shannon Jenkins (2007)
A Woman's Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative CandidatesPolitical Research Quarterly, 60
R. Alvarez, Jason Saving (1997)
Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980sPolitical Research Quarterly, 50
Donald Thistlewaite, D. Campbell (1960)
Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex-Post Facto ExperimentObservational Studies, 3
Thistlethwaite Thistlethwaite, Campbell Campbell (1960)
Regression‐Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto ExperimentJournal of Educational Psychology, 51
Lawrence Kahn, Peter Sherer (1988)
Racial Differences in Professional Basketball Players' CompensationJournal of Labor Economics, 6
J. Ferejohn (1986)
Incumbent performance and electoral controlPublic Choice, 50
Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, E. Duflo (2004)
WOMEN AS POLICY MAKERS: EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED POLICY EXPERIMENT IN INDIAEconometrica, 72
M. Rehavi (2007)
Sex and Politics: Do Female Legislators Aect State Spending?
Besley Besley, Case Case (2003)
Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United StatesJournal of Economic Literature, 41
Kathleen Dolan (1997)
Gender differences in support for women candidates: Is there a glass ceiling in American politics?Women & Politics, 17
Jennifer Lawless, Kathryn Pearson (2006)
The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional WisdomThe Journal of Politics, 70
S. Rosenwasser, Norma Dean (1989)
Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political OfficePsychology of Women Quarterly, 13
P. Sellers (1997)
Fiscal Consistency and Federal District Spending in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
William Howell, Scott Adler, C. Cameron, Charles Riemann (2000)
Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25
T. Persson, G. Roland, G. Tabellini (1997)
Separation of Powers and Political AccountabilityQuarterly Journal of Economics, 112
J. Banks, R. Sundaram (1998)
Optimal Retention in Agency ProblemsJournal of Economic Theory, 82
D. Evans (2004)
Greasing the wheels : using pork barrel projects to build majority coalitions in Congress
T. Besley, A. Case (2002)
Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United StatesCEPR Discussion Paper Series
Fox Fox, Lawless Lawless (2004)
Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for OfficeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 48
J. Milyo, Samantha Schosberg (2000)
Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House ElectionsPublic Choice, 105
Frances Lee (1998)
Representation and Public Policy: The Consequences of Senate Apportionment for the Geographic Distribution of Federal FundsThe Journal of Politics, 60
R. Fox, Jennifer Lawless, Courtney Feeley (2001)
Gender and the Decision to Run for OfficeLegislative Studies Quarterly, 26
Sue Thomas (1991)
The Impact of Women on State Legislative PoliciesThe Journal of Politics, 53
Lawrence Kahn (1991)
Discrimination in Professional Sports: A Survey of the LiteratureIndustrial & Labor Relations Review, 44
L. Huddy, Nayda Terkildsen (1993)
The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of OfficePolitical Research Quarterly, 46
M. Fiorina (1981)
Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 25
R. Barro (1973)
The control of politicians: An economic modelPublic Choice, 14
Lyn Kathlene (1994)
Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing DebatesAmerican Political Science Review, 88
David Lee (2005)
Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House electionsJournal of Econometrics, 142
Brian Knight (2005)
Estimating the Value of Proposal PowerThe American Economic Review, 95
J. Fearon (1999)
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation: Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance
S. Gordon, G. Huber, Dimitri Landa (2005)
Challenger Entry and Voter LearningAmerican Political Science Review, 101
S. Levitt, J. Snyder (1995)
The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election OutcomesJournal of Political Economy, 105
R. Fox, Eric Smith (1998)
The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision-MakingPolitical Psychology, 19
Barbara Burrell (1994)
A woman''s place is in the House
C. Uhlaner, K. Schlozman (1986)
Candidate Gender and Congressional Campaign ReceiptsThe Journal of Politics, 48
(2007)
Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
Alana Jeydel, Andrew Taylor (2003)
Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Evidence from the U.S. House in the 103rd-105th CongressPolitical Research Quarterly, 56
P. Seabright (1996)
Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts modelEuropean Economic Review, 40
Joshua Clinton, J. Lapinski (2006)
Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1994American Journal of Political Science, 50
Noelle Norton (1999)
Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in CongressLegislative Studies Quarterly, 24
If voters are biased against female candidates, only the most talented, hardest working female candidates will succeed in the electoral process. Furthermore, if women perceive there to be sex discrimination in the electoral process, or if they underestimate their qualifications for office, then only the most qualified, politically ambitious females will emerge as candidates. We argue that when either or both forms of sex‐based selection are present, the women who are elected to office will perform better, on average, than their male counterparts. We test this central implication of our theory by studying the relative success of men and women in delivering federal spending to their districts and in sponsoring legislation. Analyzing changes within districts over time, we find that congresswomen secure roughly 9% more spending from federal discretionary programs than congressmen. Women also sponsor and cosponsor significantly more bills than their male colleagues.
American Journal of Political Science – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.