Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ruben Gonzalez-Vicente (2011)
The internationalization of the Chinese statePolitical Geography, 30
M. Foucault (1980)
Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977
Weidong Liu (2021)
Confucian geopolitics or Chinese geopolitics?Dialogues in Human Geography, 11
Baogang He (2018)
The Domestic Politics of the Belt and Road Initiative and its ImplicationsJournal of Contemporary China, 28
C.K. Lee (2018)
The specter of global China: Politics, labor, and foreign investment in Africa
T. Summers (2016)
China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economyThird World Quarterly, 37
Diana Coole, S. Frost (2010)
New materialisms : ontology, agency, and politics
Jean-Marc Blanchard (2021)
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Blues: Powering BRI Research Back on Track to Avoid Choppy SeasJournal of Chinese Political Science, 26
T. Goodfellow, Zhengli Huang (2020)
Contingent infrastructure and the dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing roads and rail in Kampala and Addis AbabaEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53
A. Amin (2014)
Lively InfrastructureTheory, Culture & Society, 31
(2018)
The Promise of Infrastructure
Although infrastructures may be material manifestations of state territorial power, the political effects of infrastructures are seldom straightforward. And yet, many accounts of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) assume a relatively conventional approach to politics, and to political power. Geopolitical intentionality and top‐down policy and strategic planning tend to be emphasised over project‐level analyses. In response to what might be viewed as an invented BRI geopolitics, this essay suggests a more technopolitical framing of the Belt and Road and seeks to apply an infrastructural analytic to the question of how political power is realised or frustrated, enhanced or diverted, by the distributed and relational nature of infrastructure projects. It argues that our understanding of the socio‐technical complexities of infrastructure is poorly served by viewing them through a conventional geopolitical lens. Instead, it seeks to lay out a research agenda and analytical framework for addressing the questions of how infrastructure projects grow and evolve, how they are embedded within the social‐political‐cultural contexts in which they develop and how they produce political effects that at times align with broader‐scale geopolitical agendas and at other times do not.
Asia Pacific Viewpoint – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2021
Keywords: Belt and Road; geopolitics; infrastructure; power; technopolitics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.