Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The “azotopure” process for treating nitrogen‐deficient aqueous wastes

The “azotopure” process for treating nitrogen‐deficient aqueous wastes Many chemical and food processing wastes are deficient in nitrogen, and must therefore be supplemented with domestic sewage or ammonia to dispose of them by conventional biological treatment. A more economical treatment, especially of strong wastes, is possible by maintaining a semipure culture of nitrogen‐fixing bacteria in a stirred aerated tank. When operated as a chemostat with 4 to 6 hr detention time, removal of 85% of the COD is possible in a single step without the need for clarifiers or digesters. A clarified effluent could also be produced by flotation or sedimentation of the flocculated bacteria. In that case there would be 99% removal of COD and a reduction in the amount of sludge by two‐thirds over the conventional activated sludge process. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biotechnology and Bioengineering Wiley

The “azotopure” process for treating nitrogen‐deficient aqueous wastes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-azotopure-process-for-treating-nitrogen-deficient-aqueous-wastes-0B7NFgrNiT

References (2)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ISSN
0006-3592
eISSN
1097-0290
DOI
10.1002/bit.260150215
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Many chemical and food processing wastes are deficient in nitrogen, and must therefore be supplemented with domestic sewage or ammonia to dispose of them by conventional biological treatment. A more economical treatment, especially of strong wastes, is possible by maintaining a semipure culture of nitrogen‐fixing bacteria in a stirred aerated tank. When operated as a chemostat with 4 to 6 hr detention time, removal of 85% of the COD is possible in a single step without the need for clarifiers or digesters. A clarified effluent could also be produced by flotation or sedimentation of the flocculated bacteria. In that case there would be 99% removal of COD and a reduction in the amount of sludge by two‐thirds over the conventional activated sludge process.

Journal

Biotechnology and BioengineeringWiley

Published: Mar 1, 1973

There are no references for this article.