Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Gardner, M. Turner, R. O'Neill, S. Lavorel (1991)
Simulation of the Scale-Dependent Effects of Landscape Boundaries on Species Persistence and Dispersal
R. Hobbs, D. Saunders, A. Main (1993)
Conservation management in fragmented systems
A. Hastings, S. Harrison (1994)
Metapopulation Dynamics and GeneticsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 25
R. Gardner, R. O'Neill (1991)
Pattern, process, and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysisEcological studies, 82
H. Pulliam, J. Dunning, Jianguo Liu (1992)
Population Dynamics in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2 2
B. Mandelbrot (1984)
Fractal Geometry of Nature
J. Wiens, N. Stenseth, B. Horne, R. Ims (1993)
Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecologyOikos, 66
D. Green (1994)
Connectivity and complexity in landscapes and ecosystemsPacific Conservation Biology, 1
H. Possingham, I. Davies (1995)
ALEX : A Model For The Viability Analysis Of Spatially Structured Populations
D. Doak, L. Mills (1994)
A Useful Role for Theory in ConservationEcology, 75
Henrik Andrén (1994)
Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a reviewOikos, 71
M. Turner, R. Gardner, V. Dale, R. O'Neill (1989)
Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapesOikos, 55
(1996)
Wildlife in patchy environments : metapopulations , mosaics and management
M. Turner, R. Gardner (1991)
Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: an introductionEcological studies, 82
J. Dunning, D. Stewart, B. Danielson, B. Noon, T. Root, R. Lamberson, E. Stevens (1995)
Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future UsesEcological Applications, 5
Jianguo Wu, S. Levin (1994)
A Spatial Patch Dynamic Modeling Approach to Pattern and Process in an Annual GrasslandEcological Monographs, 64
R. Plotnick, R. Gardner (1993)
Lattices and landscapes
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
N. Myers, M. Soulé (1987)
Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and DiversityBioScience
S. Harrison (1991)
Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluationBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 42
I. Hanski (1994)
Spatial scale, patchiness and population dynamics on landPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 343
J. Wiens (1997)
Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology
J. Quinn, A. Hastings (1987)
Extinction in Subdivided HabitatsConservation Biology, 1
R. Gardner, R. O'Neill, M. Turner (1993)
Ecological implications of landscape fragmentation
J. Rolstad (1991)
Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidenceBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 42
J. Cummings, S. Vessey (1994)
Agricultural Influences on Movement Patterns of White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus)American Midland Naturalist, 132
J. Wiens (1997)
The Emerging Role of Patchiness in Conservation Biology
Jianguo Liu, J. Dunning, H. Pulliam, Resumen (1995)
Potential Effects of a Forest Management Plan on Bachman's Sparrows (Aimophila aestivalis): Linking a Spatially Explicit Model with GISConservation Biology, 9
I. Hanski, T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, G. Lei (1995)
Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscapeOikos, 72
Kimberly With, R. Gardner, M. Turner (1997)
Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environmentsOikos, 78
R. Lamberson, R. McKelvey, B. Noon, C. Voss (1992)
A Dynamic Analysis of Northern Spotted Owl Viability in a Fragmented Forest LandscapeConservation Biology, 6
I. Hanski (1994)
A Practical Model of Metapopulation DynamicsJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
J. Krummel, R. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R. O'Neill, P. Coleman (1987)
Landscape patterns in a disturbed environmentOikos, 48
E. Gustafson, R. Gardner (1996)
The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch ColonizationEcology, 77
Kimberly With, T. Crist (1995)
Critical Thresholds in Species' Responses to Landscape StructureEcology, 76
N. Kotliar, J. Wiens (1990)
Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneityOikos, 59
(1996)
An organism-based perspective of habitat fragmentation. Pages 75-95 in
L. Fahrig, G. Merriam (1994)
Conservation of fragmented populationsConservation Biology, 8
R. Hobbs (1992)
The role of corridors in conservation: Solution or bandwagon?Trends in ecology & evolution, 7 11
G. Caughley (1994)
Directions in conservation biologyJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
(1994)
Demographic processes: population dynamics on heterogeneous landscapes
J. Addicott, J. Aho, M. Antolin, D. Padilla, J. Richardson, D. Soluk (1987)
Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patternsOikos, 49
D. Saupe (1988)
Algorithms for random fractals
I. Hanski, M. Gilpin (1991)
Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain
S. Lavorel, R. O'Neill, R. Gardner (1994)
Spatio-Temporal Dispersal Strategies and Annual Plant Species Coexistence in a Structured LandscapeOikos, 71
William Lahaye, R. Gutiérrez, H. Akçakaya (1994)
Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in Southern CaliforniaJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
V. Dale, S. Pearson, H. Offerman, R. O'Neill (1994)
Relating Patterns of Land‐Use Change to Faunal Biodiversity in the Central AmazonConservation Biology, 8
R. Orbach (1986)
Dynamics of Fractal NetworksScience, 231
M. Palmer (1992)
The Coexistence of Species in Fractal LandscapesThe American Naturalist, 139
B. Wilcox, D. Murphy (1985)
Conservation Strategy: The Effects of Fragmentation on ExtinctionThe American Naturalist, 125
P. Beier (1993)
Determining Minimum Habitat Areas and Habitat Corridors for CougarsConservation Biology, 7
J. Metz, O. Diekmann (1986)
The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations
R. Lande (1987)
Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial PopulationsThe American Naturalist, 130
C. Ryall (1998)
Principles of conservation biologyEnvironmentalist, 19
S. Lavorel, R. Gardner, R. O'Neill (1993)
Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapesOikos, 67
R. O'Neill, R. Gardner, B. Milne, M. Turner, B. Jackson (1991)
Heterogeneity and spatial hierarchiesEcological studies, 86
I. Hanski, D. Simberloff (1997)
The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation
C. Dytham, D. DeAngelis, L. Gross (1992)
Individual-Based Models and Approaches in EcologyJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
R. Levins (1969)
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological ControlBulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15
H. Peitgen, M. Barnsley (2011)
The science of fractal images
I. Hanski, A. Moilanen, T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari (1996)
The Quantitative Incidence Function Model and Persistence of an Endangered Butterfly MetapopulationConservation Biology, 10
L. Fahrig (1988)
A general model of populations in patchy habitatsApplied Mathematics and Computation, 27
(1994)
Metapopulations and conservation. Pages 111-128 in P
Neutral landscape models, derived from percolation theory in the field of landscape ecology, are grid‐based maps in which complex habitat distributions are generated by random or fractal algorithms. This grid‐based representation of landscape structure is compatible with the raster‐based format of geographical information systems (GIS), which facilitates comparisons between theoretical and real landscapes. Neutral landscape models permit the identification of critical thresholds in connectivity, which can be used to predict when landscapes will become fragmented. The coupling of neutral landscape models with generalized population models, such as metapopulation theory, provides a null model for generating predictions about population dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Neutral landscape models can contribute to the following applications in conservation: (1) incorporation of complex spatial patterns in (meta)population models; (2) identification of species’ perceptions of landscape structure; (3) determination of landscape connectivity; (4) evaluation of the consequences of habitat fragmentation for population subdivision; (5) identification of the domain of metapopulation dynamics; (6) prediction of the occurrence of extinction thresholds; ( 7) determination of the genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation; and (8) reserve design and ecosystem management. This generalized, spatially explicit framework bridges the gap between spatially implicit, patch‐based models and spatially realistic GIS applications which are usually parameterized for a single species in a specific landscape. Development of a generalized, spatially explicit framework is essential in conservation biology because we will not be able to develop individual models for every species of management concern.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Oct 16, 1997
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.