Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Carita Paradis (2008)
Configurations, construals and change: expressions of DEGREE1English Language and Linguistics, 12
(2003)
Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonyms, synonyms and other semantic paradigms
Natalja Ivanova, Qian Yang, S. Bastian, K. Wilkinson, R. Ford (2021)
Consumer understanding of beer and wine body: an exploratory study of an ill-defined conceptFood Quality and Preference
F. Biassoni (2009)
Basic qualities in naïve subjects' perception of voice. Are they based on contrary properties?
P. Chilton (2019)
Cognitive LinguisticsThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology
H. Truong, R. Burro, Ivana Bianchi (2021)
The sensorial experience of wine for nonexperts: How the terms frequently used in Italian guidebooks are understood by standard consumers in VietnamJournal of Sensory Studies, 36
H. Hopfer, H. Heymann (2014)
Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists?Food Quality and Preference, 32
H. Rodrigues, Jordi Ballester, M. Sáenz-Navajas, D. Valentin (2015)
Structural approach of social representation: Application to the concept of wine minerality in experts and consumersFood Quality and Preference, 46
S. Jones, M. Murphy, Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners (2012)
Antonyms in English: Construals, Constructions and Canonicity
P. Rousseeuw (1987)
Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysisJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20
(2017)
factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses
(2015)
Applications of conceptual spaces. Synthese library (studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science
R. Scruton (2009)
I Drink Therefore I Am: A Philosopher's Guide to Wine
(2019)
Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions
I. Bianchi, U. Savardi, M. Kubovy (2011)
Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological theory of opposites, 26
Ivana Bianchi, U. Savardi, R. Burro, Maria Martelli (2014)
Doing the opposite to what another person is doing.Acta psychologica, 151
(2020)
Australian wine: Production, sales and inventory report, 2018–19
David Scott (1990)
The New S LanguageTechnometrics, 32
Ivana Bianchi, R. Burro, Stefania Torquati, U. Savardi (2013)
The middle of the road: perceiving intermediates.Acta psychologica, 144 1
Carita Paradis (2013)
The Construal of Spatial Meaning: Windows into Conceptual Space
S. Charters, S. Pettigrew (2007)
The dimensions of wine qualityFood Quality and Preference, 18
Angus Hughson, R. Boakes (2002)
The knowing nose: the role of knowledge in wine expertiseFood Quality and Preference, 13
R. Caballero, Ernesto Suárez-Toste, C. Paradis (2019)
Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and CulturesConverging Evidence in Language and Communication Research
(2022)
Testing Australian standard consumers
Ivana Bianchi, U. Savardi (2008)
The perception of Contraries.
C. Paradis, Mats Eeg-Olofsson (2013)
Describing Sensory Experience: The Genre of Wine ReviewsMetaphor and Symbol, 28
Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners, S. Jones (2009)
Good and bad opposites: using textual and experimental techniques to measure antonym canonicityThe Mental Lexicon, 4
R. Tibshirani, G. Walther, T. Hastie (2000)
Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statisticJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63
S. Jones (2002)
Antonymy: A Corpus-Based Perspective
(2020)
The best way to explore trade data (wine)
C. Paradis (2015)
Conceptual Spaces at Work in Sensory Cognition: Domains, Dimensions and Distances
(2013)
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.JAMA, 310 20
G. Zucco, Aurelio Carassai, M. Baroni, R. Stevenson (2011)
Labeling, Identification, and Recognition of Wine-Relevant Odorants in Expert Sommeliers, Intermediates, and Untrained Wine DrinkersPerception, 40
Ivana Bianchi, Erika Branchini, Stefania Torquati, Arianna Fermani, E. Capitani, Veronica Barnaba, U. Savardi, R. Burro (2021)
Non experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: An investigation based on oppositesFood Quality and Preference, 92
Jordi Ballester, B. Patris, R. Symoneaux, D. Valentin (2008)
Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces: Does expertise matter?Food Quality and Preference, 19
L. Torri, C. Dinnella, A. Recchia, T. Næs, H. Tuorila, E. Monteleone (2013)
Projective Mapping for interpreting wine aroma differences as perceived by naïve and experienced assessorsFood Quality and Preference, 29
Ivana Bianchi, U. Savardi, M. Kubovy (2011)
Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological approach to oppositesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 26
F. Biassoni (2009)
The perception and cognition of contraries
Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners, S. Jones (2009)
Good and bad opposites
I. Bianchi, U. Savardi (2018)
Spatial biases in perception and cognition
Christiane, Druml, Wolzt, Pleiner (2000)
World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 14
A. Lehrer (1983)
Wine and conversation
I. Croijmans, L. Speed, A. Arshamian, A. Majid (2020)
Expertise Shapes Multimodal Imagery for WineCognitive Science, 44
G. Solomon (1990)
Psychology of novice and expert wine talkAmerican Journal of Psychology, 103
Ivana Bianchi, U. Savardi (2018)
Spatial Contraries and Mirrors.
(2015)
Foundation for Statistical Computing. Austria
W. Parr, M. Mouret, S. Blackmore, T. Pelquest-Hunt, I. Urdapilleta (2011)
Representation of complexity in wine: Influence of expertiseFood Quality and Preference, 22
R. Thorndike (1953)
Who belongs in the family?Psychometrika, 18
Ivana Bianchi, Carita Paradis, R. Burro, Joost Weijer, M. Nyström, U. Savardi (2017)
Identification of opposites and intermediates by eye and by hand.Acta psychologica, 180
R. Burro, U. Savardi, M. Annunziata, P. Paoli, Ivana Bianchi (2018)
The effects of presenting oncologic information in terms of opposites in a medical contextPatient preference and adherence, 12
Carita Paradis, Caroline Willners (2011)
Antonymy: from convention to meaning-makingReview of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9
INTRODUCTION“Wine is not just an object of pleasure, but an object of knowledge; and the pleasure depends on the knowledge” (Scruton, 2013). It has been repeatedly acknowledged that wine appreciation varies depending on the drinker's level of interest and degree of expertise. The differences between experts and nonexperts concern the ability to discriminate the properties of wine, their memory of other wines they have drunk (for comparison purposes) and the richness and variety of the language that they are able to use to talk about wine (Ballester, Patris, Symoneaux, & Valentin, 2008; Charters & Pettigrew, 2007; Croijmans, Speed, Arshamian, & Majid, 2020; Hopfer & Heymann, 2014; Hughson & Boakes, 2000; Torri et al., 2013; Zucco, Carassai, Baroni, & Stevenson, 2011). Professionals have an essential role in influencing the sales of wine by means of their reviews and ratings; but standard consumers have an important role too since their buying behavior has a direct impact on the wine market. Wine sensory descriptions are written by wine experts, but these descriptions are often not meaningful for nonexperts (Parr, Mouret, Blackmore, Pelquest‐Hunt, & Urdapilleta, 2011; Rodrigues, Ballester, Saenz‐Navajas, & Valentin, 2015; Solomon, 1990) and terms often have different meanings for experts and nonexperts (Bianchi et al., 2021; Ivanova, Yang, Bastian, Wilkinson, & Ford, 2022). The
Journal of Sensory Studies – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.