Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework

Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible... Aim To describe a general modelling framework for integrating multiple pattern‐ and process‐related factors into biodiversity conservation assessments across whole landscapes. Location New South Wales (Australia), and world‐wide. Methods The framework allows for a rich array of alternatives to the target‐based model traditionally underpinning systematic conservation planning and consists of three broad modelling components. The first component models the future state (condition) of habitat across a landscape as a function of present state, current and projected pressures acting on this state, and any proposed, or implemented, management interventions. The second component uses this spatially explicit prediction of future habitat state to model the level of persistence expected for each of a set of surrogate biodiversity entities. The third component then integrates these individual expectations to estimate the overall level of persistence expected for biodiversity as a whole. Results Options are explored for tailoring implementation of the framework to suit planning processes varying markedly in purpose, and in availability of data, time, funding and expertise. The framework allows considerable flexibility in the nature of employed biodiversity surrogates (species‐level, discrete or continuous community‐level) and spatial data structures (polygonal planning units, or fine‐scaled raster), the level of sophistication with which each of the three modelling components is implemented (from simple target‐based assessment to complex process‐based modelling approaches), and the forms of higher‐level analysis supported (e.g. optimal plan development, priority mapping, interactive scenario evaluation). Main conclusions The described framework provides a logical, and highly flexible, foundation for integrating disparate pattern‐ and process‐related factors into conservation assessments in dynamic, multiple‐use landscapes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Diversity and Distributions Wiley

Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/synthesis-of-pattern-and-process-in-biodiversity-conservation-k0NyB22jYD
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN
1366-9516
eISSN
1472-4642
DOI
10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00657.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Aim To describe a general modelling framework for integrating multiple pattern‐ and process‐related factors into biodiversity conservation assessments across whole landscapes. Location New South Wales (Australia), and world‐wide. Methods The framework allows for a rich array of alternatives to the target‐based model traditionally underpinning systematic conservation planning and consists of three broad modelling components. The first component models the future state (condition) of habitat across a landscape as a function of present state, current and projected pressures acting on this state, and any proposed, or implemented, management interventions. The second component uses this spatially explicit prediction of future habitat state to model the level of persistence expected for each of a set of surrogate biodiversity entities. The third component then integrates these individual expectations to estimate the overall level of persistence expected for biodiversity as a whole. Results Options are explored for tailoring implementation of the framework to suit planning processes varying markedly in purpose, and in availability of data, time, funding and expertise. The framework allows considerable flexibility in the nature of employed biodiversity surrogates (species‐level, discrete or continuous community‐level) and spatial data structures (polygonal planning units, or fine‐scaled raster), the level of sophistication with which each of the three modelling components is implemented (from simple target‐based assessment to complex process‐based modelling approaches), and the forms of higher‐level analysis supported (e.g. optimal plan development, priority mapping, interactive scenario evaluation). Main conclusions The described framework provides a logical, and highly flexible, foundation for integrating disparate pattern‐ and process‐related factors into conservation assessments in dynamic, multiple‐use landscapes.

Journal

Diversity and DistributionsWiley

Published: May 1, 2010

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off