Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kilmann, R. Herden (1976)
Towards A Systemic Methodology For Evaluating The Impact Of Interventions On Organizational EffectivenessAcademy of Management Review, 1
Kilmann Kilmann, Herden Herden (1976)
Towards a systematic methodology for evaluating the impact of organizational interventions on organizational effectivenessAcademy of Management Review, 1
O. Tzeng, D. Outcalt, S. Boyer, R. Ware, D. Landis (1984)
Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.Journal of personality assessment, 48 3
I. Mitroff, R. Kilmann (1975)
On evaluating scientific research: The contribution of the psychology of scienceTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 8
F. Hoy, Don Hellriegel (1982)
The Kilmann and Herden Model of Organizational Effectiveness Criteria for Small Business ManagersAcademy of Management Journal, 25
I. Mitroff, J. Nelson, R. Mason (1974)
On Management Myth-Information SystemsManagement Science, 21
E. Lusk (1979)
A Test of Differential Performance Peaking for a Disembedding TaskJournal of Accounting Research, 17
Nutt Nutt (1986b)
Decision style and its influence on the strategic decisions of top executivesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 30
P. Keen, G. Bronsema (2015)
Cognitive Style Research: A Perspective for Integration
D. Robey, W. Taggart (1981)
Measuring Managers' Minds: The Assessment Of Style in Human Information ProcessingAcademy of Management Review, 6
P. Nutt (1986)
Evaluating MIS Design PrinciplesMIS Q., 10
W. Taggart, D. Robey (1981)
Minds and Managers: On the Dual Nature Of Human Information Processing And ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 6
Stephen Barkin, G. Dickson (1977)
An investigation of information system utilizationInf. Manag., 1
R. Zmud (1978)
Note—On the Validity of the Analytic-Heuristic Instrument Utilized in “The Minnesota Experiments”Management Science, 24
R. Kilmann, K. Thomas (1975)
Interpersonal Conflict-Handling Behavior as Reflections of Jungian Personality DimensionsPsychological Reports, 37
Henderson Henderson, Nutt Nutt (1980)
The influence of decision style on decision behaviourManagement Science, 26
Torbert Torbert (1983)
Executive mind, timely actionPersuasion, 6
Benbasat Benbasat, Dexter Dexter (1979)
Value and events approaches to accounting: an experimental evaluationAccounting Review, LIV
Blaylock Blaylock, Rees Rees (1984)
Cognitive style and the usefulness of informationManagement Science, 15
H. Witkin, D. Goodenough (1976)
Field dependence and interpersonal behavior.Psychological bulletin, 84 4
Hellriegel Hellriegel, Slocum Slocum (1980)
Preferred organizational designs and problem solving styles: interesting companiesHuman Systems Management, 2
P. Nutt (1986)
Decision style and strategic decisions of top executivesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 30
J. Henderson, P. Nutt (1980)
The Influence of Decision Style on Decision Making BehaviorManagement Science, 26
P. Nutt (1979)
Influence of decision styles on use of decision modelsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 14
Mitroff Mitroff, Kilmann Kilmann (1975)
On evaluating scientific research: the contributions of the philosophy of scienceTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 8
M. Vasarhelyi (1977)
Man-Machine Planning Systems: A Cognitive Style Examination of Interactive Decision MakingJournal of Accounting Research, 15
R. Doktor, W. Hamilton (1973)
Cognitive Style and the Acceptance of Management Science RecommendationsManagement Science, 19
R. Mason, I. Mitroff (1973)
A Program for Research on Management Information SystemsManagement Science, 19
A. Ramaprasad, I. Mitroff (1984)
On formulating strategic problemsAcademy of Management Review, 9
ABSTRACT The influence of a manager's decision style in strategic decision‐making is explored using simulations. The Jungian style classification is extended to identify ‘data and process dominant’ styles of decision‐making. Managers with process dominant styles can use several types of data and managers with data dominant styles can apply various modes of data processing. Both the expanded and the traditional definitions of style are used as factors to explain how 79 top executives and 89 middle managers rated project simulations. Decision style is found to be a key factor in explaining the likelihood of taking strategic action and the risk seen in this action. Decisions made by top executives are more style dependent than those of middle managers. The extended definition of style reveals more about the preferences of top executives than traditional style categories.
Journal of Management Studies – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.