Statistical models of the relationship between the distribution of each of five foetal dimensions and gestational age are developed based on serial ultrasound biometric data from a prospective longitudinal study in Perth, Western Australia. Both the response variable and the gestational age timescale are transformed to establish an approximately linear relationship within subjects. This relationship is modelled using a linear mixed effects model that accounts for between‐subject heterogeneity by incorporating subject specific random effects for both intercept and gradient. These models are used to motivate three measures of foetal growth: the conditional centile or z‐score of a current measurement given an earlier value for the same measurement; the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of the subject specific random effect gradient (which is shown to be invariant to transformations of location and scale), and the standardized residual at a given gestational age, which characterizes departures from the modelled growth trajectory. We illustrate how these three measures of growth might be applied to subsequent health outcomes in later life by relating growth in foetal abdominal circumference to blood pressure in children from the same cohort at six years of age. Foetuses whose summary measures indicate poor growth in abdominal circumference have higher blood pressure in early childhood, supporting the ‘foetal origins’ hypothesis that many chronic diseases of adulthood have their origins before birth. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Statistics in Medicine – Wiley
Published: Nov 30, 2001
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera