Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization–competition trade‐off

Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization–competition trade‐off Summary 1 Results from patch‐occupancy metapopulation models indicate that a trade‐off between competitive and colonization abilities is necessary for species to coexist in patchy environments. However, such models are often based on unrealistic ecological assumptions, such as global dispersal and no local population dynamics. 2 We develop a plant metapopulation model that allows us to sequentially relax unrealistic assumptions about dispersal and local population interactions. We use our model to examine the extent to which the conclusions of analytical, patch‐based coexistence models depend on their assumptions. 3 We found that the need for an inferior competitor to be a superior colonizer was reduced by using a dispersal kernel to distribute seeds, and totally removed by relaxing the assumption of instantaneous competitive displacement. These results hold for annual or perennial plants with or without seedbanks, for global, local and stratified dispersal, for delayed competitive exclusion, two‐way competition and neighbourhood competition, and for landscapes where habitat patches are either adjacent or disjunct. 4 We conclude that the results of patch‐occupancy metapopulation models differ greatly from results of models that incorporate more realistic assumptions about dispersal and local population dynamics. As a result it may be premature to base biodiversity management and policy on the results of patch‐occupancy models. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Ecology Wiley

Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization–competition trade‐off

Journal of Ecology, Volume 90 (4) – Aug 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/spatially-realistic-plant-metapopulation-models-and-the-colonization-tHg0WVT7oA
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0022-0477
eISSN
1365-2745
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00694.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary 1 Results from patch‐occupancy metapopulation models indicate that a trade‐off between competitive and colonization abilities is necessary for species to coexist in patchy environments. However, such models are often based on unrealistic ecological assumptions, such as global dispersal and no local population dynamics. 2 We develop a plant metapopulation model that allows us to sequentially relax unrealistic assumptions about dispersal and local population interactions. We use our model to examine the extent to which the conclusions of analytical, patch‐based coexistence models depend on their assumptions. 3 We found that the need for an inferior competitor to be a superior colonizer was reduced by using a dispersal kernel to distribute seeds, and totally removed by relaxing the assumption of instantaneous competitive displacement. These results hold for annual or perennial plants with or without seedbanks, for global, local and stratified dispersal, for delayed competitive exclusion, two‐way competition and neighbourhood competition, and for landscapes where habitat patches are either adjacent or disjunct. 4 We conclude that the results of patch‐occupancy metapopulation models differ greatly from results of models that incorporate more realistic assumptions about dispersal and local population dynamics. As a result it may be premature to base biodiversity management and policy on the results of patch‐occupancy models.

Journal

Journal of EcologyWiley

Published: Aug 1, 2002

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off