Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sonographic correlate of stationary waves

Sonographic correlate of stationary waves Stationary waves are a rare and inconsistent angiographic finding that has been attributed to various causes, including angiographic artifact. We present 2 cases of patients with arterial occlusion in whom sonographic examination revealed a correlate of stationary waves that was present on angiography. This report is, to our knowledge, the first to document the phenomenon of stationary waves using an imaging modality other than angiography. If the sonographic findings presented here are accepted as a correlate of stationary waves, the phenomenon of stationary waves can no longer be considered a specific angiographic finding, and theories attributing the phenomenon to an angiographic artifact must be rejected. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 32:158–161, 2004 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Clinical Ultrasound Wiley

Sonographic correlate of stationary waves

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/sonographic-correlate-of-stationary-waves-C459a7U2zH

References (15)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0091-2751
eISSN
1097-0096
DOI
10.1002/jcu.20006
pmid
14994259
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Stationary waves are a rare and inconsistent angiographic finding that has been attributed to various causes, including angiographic artifact. We present 2 cases of patients with arterial occlusion in whom sonographic examination revealed a correlate of stationary waves that was present on angiography. This report is, to our knowledge, the first to document the phenomenon of stationary waves using an imaging modality other than angiography. If the sonographic findings presented here are accepted as a correlate of stationary waves, the phenomenon of stationary waves can no longer be considered a specific angiographic finding, and theories attributing the phenomenon to an angiographic artifact must be rejected. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 32:158–161, 2004

Journal

Journal of Clinical UltrasoundWiley

Published: Mar 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.