Soil Water Hysteresis in Silt Loam and Clay Loam Soils

Soil Water Hysteresis in Silt Loam and Clay Loam Soils The microhydrologic properties involving water content, pressure head, and hydraulic conductivity were measured simultaneously for a silt loam and for a clay loam soil. Large hysteresis in the water content‐pressure head relationship was found for both soils, the silt loam soil showing the larger amount. There was no measurable hysteresis in the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and water content in either soil. The data from the clay loam soil showed considerable scatter attributed to structural rearrangement in the soil during measurement. A formulation of the independent domain theory by Everett was unsatisfactory for predicting the observed scanning curves in the water content‐pressure head relationships of both soils. A theorem of an alternative formulation by Enderby was tested by comparing differences in slopes for reversals from drying to wetting along the main curves to those found on a scanning curve; Enderby's formulation was probably no better for the silt loam soil under the conditions of test than that of Everett. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

Soil Water Hysteresis in Silt Loam and Clay Loam Soils

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/soil-water-hysteresis-in-silt-loam-and-clay-loam-soils-L2zrNNusvQ
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The microhydrologic properties involving water content, pressure head, and hydraulic conductivity were measured simultaneously for a silt loam and for a clay loam soil. Large hysteresis in the water content‐pressure head relationship was found for both soils, the silt loam soil showing the larger amount. There was no measurable hysteresis in the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and water content in either soil. The data from the clay loam soil showed considerable scatter attributed to structural rearrangement in the soil during measurement. A formulation of the independent domain theory by Everett was unsatisfactory for predicting the observed scanning curves in the water content‐pressure head relationships of both soils. A theorem of an alternative formulation by Enderby was tested by comparing differences in slopes for reversals from drying to wetting along the main curves to those found on a scanning curve; Enderby's formulation was probably no better for the silt loam soil under the conditions of test than that of Everett.

Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: Aug 1, 1971

References

  • Hysteresis in two sands and the independent domain model
    Talsma, Talsma
  • Hysteresis during infiltration and redistribution in a soil column at different initial water contents
    Vachaud, Vachaud; Thony, Thony

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off