Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/secondary-school-science-teachers-arguments-for-the-particulate-nature-aJRA4em5cN
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
- ISSN
- 0022-4308
- eISSN
- 1098-2736
- D.O.I.
- 10.1002/tea.21428
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
How do secondary school science teachers justify the model of a particulate nature of matter, and how do the arguments they use relate to historical arguments? To find out, we individually interviewed 11 in‐service secondary school science teachers (certified to teach chemistry and/or physics in secondary school, and with 2 to 30 years of teaching experience) regarding their arguments for the particulate nature of matter and experiments that could demonstrate the existence of particles. The collected data were qualitatively analyzed. Three qualitatively different categories of arguments could be constructed from data: philosophical arguments, indirect experimental arguments, and direct experimental arguments. The indirect experimental arguments which is the largest category could be further divided into qualitatively different subcategories: nonspecific research and experiments, and chemical, physical, and subatomic experiments. Even though several experiments and arguments were suggested by the informants in our study, the arguments regarding the validity of the experiments were quite uncertain and vague. The experiments and arguments were used to corroborate the particulate nature of matter and taken for granted in advance rather than used to justify a model with particles. The outcome was discussed in relation to scientific arguments and experiments and in view of results from previous science education research. Based on our data, teacher education and in‐service teacher training, as well as teacher guides, were suggested to be more elaborate regarding contemporary knowledge, with direct experimental evidence for the particulate nature of matter being presented.
Journal
Journal of Research in Science Teaching – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
Recommended Articles
Loading...
References
-
Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle modelAlbanese, A.; Vicentini, M.
-
Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12–16)Andersson, B.
-
Saving Mach's view on atomsBächtold, M.
-
Teachers' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: The case of Zambian pre‐service science teachersBanda, A.; Mumba, F.; Chabalengula, V. M.; Mbewe, S.
-
Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university‐level physical chemistry classBecker, N.; Rasmussen, C.; Sweedey, G.; Wawro, M.; Towns, M.; Cole, R.
-
The roadmap approach to portray and develop chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge concerning the particulate nature of matterBindernagel, J. A.; Eilks, I.
-
Aspects of secondary students' understanding of the particulate nature of matterBrook, A.; Briggs, H.; Driver, R.
-
Current measurement by real‐time counting of single electronsBylander, J.; Duty, T.; Delsing, P.
-
Retracing the ancient steps to atomic theoryChalmers, A.
-
The scientist's atom and the philosopher's stone. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 279Chalmers, A.
-
The modelling ability of non‐major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub‐microscopic levelChittleborough, G.; Treagust, D. F.
-
A report on the Wilson cloud chamber and its applications in physicsDas Gupta, N. N.; Ghosh, S. K.
-
Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistryJong, O.; Driel, J. H.; Verloop, N.
-
The particulate nature of matter in science educationVos, W.; Verdonk, A.
-
Making sense of secondary science—Research into children's ideasDriver, R.; Squires, A.; Rushworth, P.; Wood‐Robinson, V.
-
Concepts of matter in science educationEilks, I.
-
On the transformation of research on teaching and learning about the sub‐micro world in chemistry education into feasible classroom practiceEilks, I.
-
TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourseErduran, S.; Simon, S.; Osborne, J.
-
Atomic‐resolution imaging with a sub‐50‐pm electron probeErni, R.; Rossell, M. D.; Kisielowski, C.; Dahmen, U.
-
The Feynman lectures on physicsFeynman, R.; Leighton, R.; Sands, M.
-
The great ideas of chemistryGillespie, R. J.
-
The structure of scientific arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topicsGray, R.; Kang, N.‐H.
-
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiriesGuba, E. G.
-
Prospective chemistry teachers' conceptions of the conservation of matter and related conceptsHaidar, A. H.
-
Chemical education: Towards research‐based practiceHarrison, A. G.; Treagust, D. F.
-
Force microscopy with light‐atom probesHembacher, S.; Giessibl, F. J.; Mannhart, J.
-
Dictionary of scientific biographyHiebert, E. N.; Körber, H.‐G.
-
Die Teilchenstruktur der Materie im Physik‐ und ChemieunterrichtJohnson, P.
-
Macro‐ and microchemistryJohnstone, A. H.
-
Beyond appearances: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideasKind, V.
-
Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter in prospective teachers training coursesKokkotas, P.; Vlachos, I.; Koulaidis, V.
-
Survey of research related to the development of the concept of ‘matter’Krnel, D.; Watson, R.; Glažar, S. A.
-
Practical research: Planning and designLeedy, P. D.; Omrod, J. E.
-
Primary student teachers' conceptions of the nature of scienceMurcia, K.; Schibeci, R.
-
Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptionsNakhleh, M. B.
-
Children's ideas in scienceNussbaum, J.
-
Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist viewNussbaum, J.
-
A cross‐national review of the studies on the particulate nature of matter and related conceptsÖzmen, H.
-
Determination of the science student teachers' understanding level and misunderstandings about the particulate nature of the matterÖzmen, H.; Ayas, A.; Coştu, B.
-
Primary teachers' particle ideas and explanations of physical phenomena: Effect of an in‐service training coursePapageorgiou, G.; Stamovlasis, D.; Johnson, P. M.
-
AtomsPerrin, J.
-
How in spite of the rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooksRodríguez, M. A.; Niaz, M.
-
A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspectiveRodríguez, M. A.; Niaz, M.
-
Empirical foundations of atomism in ancient Greek philosophySakkopoulos, S. A.; Vitoratos, E. G.
-
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projectsShenton, A. K.
-
Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teachingShulman, L. S.
-
Using Toulmin's argument pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school scienceSimon, S.
-
Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry educationTaber, K.
-
On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of structure of matterTalanquer, V.
-
The uses of argumentToulmin, S.
-
Chemical education: Towards research‐based practiceTreagust, D. F.
-
Concepts of matter in science education
-
Concepts of matter in science educationTsaparlis, G.; Sevian, H.
-
Primary student teachers' understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolvingValanides, N.
-
Primary student teachers' understanding of the process and effects of distillationValanides, N.
-
Teachers' knowledge of models and modelling in scienceDriel, J. H.; Verloop, N.
-
International handbook of research on conceptual changeWiser, M.; Smith, C.
@Phil_Robichaud
@deepthiw
@JoseServera