Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Walsh (1997)
A multivariate method for determining optimal subsample size in the analysis of macroinvertebrate samplesMarine and Freshwater Research, 48
F. D.P, P. Walker (1996)
How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches, 3
M. Christman, D. Culver (2001)
The relationship between cave biodiversity and available habitatJournal of Biogeography, 28
W. Hagemeijer, M. Blair (1997)
The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds
T. Braak, F. Cateten, P. Šmilauer (2002)
Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord
A. Mitchell-Jones, G. Amori, W. Bogdanowicz, B. Kryštufek, P. Reijnders, F. Spitzenberger, M. Stubbe, J. Thissen, V. Vohralík, J. Zima (1999)
The Atlas of European Mammals
F. Szalay (2000)
The Atlas of European Mammals. A. J. Mitchell-Jones , G. Amori , W. Bogdanowicz , B. Kryštufek , P. J. H. Reijnders , F. Spitzenberger , M. Stubbe , J. B. M. Thissen , V. Vohralik , J. ZimaThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 75
J. Day, J. Field, M. Montgomery (1971)
The Use of Numerical Methods to Determine the Distribution of the Benthic Fauna Across the Continental Shelf of North CarolinaJournal of Animal Ecology, 40
N. Mantel (1967)
The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.Cancer research, 27 2
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, R. Pressey (1988)
Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversityBiological Conservation, 43
(2001)
Complementarity. Encyclopedia of biodiversity
Austin Austin, Nicholls Nicholls, Margules Margules (1990)
Measurement of the realized niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus speciesEcological Monographs, 60
D. Fairbanks, B. Reyers, A. Jaarsveld (2001)
Species and environment representation: selecting reserves for the retention of avian diversity in KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaBiological Conservation, 98
(1997)
An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity
M. Fortescue (2001)
Pattern and Process: A Whiteheadian perspective on linguistics
D. Mccollin (1993)
Avian distribution patterns in a fragmented wooded landscape (North Humberside, U.K.): the role of between-patch and within-patch structure, 3
R. Develice, Jean DeVELICE, G. Park (1988)
Gradient Analysis in Nature Reserve Design: A New Zealand ExampleConservation Biology, 2
C. Braak, P. Šmilauer (1998)
CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4)
P. Williams, Helen Klerk, T. Crowe (1999)
Interpreting biogeographical boundaries among Afrotropical birds: spatial patterns in richness gradients and species replacementJournal of Biogeography, 26
M. Araújo, P. Densham, C. Humphries (2003)
Predicting species diversity with ED: the quest for evidenceEcography, 26
C. Moritz, K. Richardson, S. Ferrier, G. Monteith, J. Stanisic, Stephen Williams, T. Whiffin (2001)
Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biotaProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268
Paul Williams (1998)
Biodiversity indicators: graphical techniques, smoothing and searching for what makes relationships workEcography, 21
T. Roberts, J. Cairns, G. Patil, W. Waters (1982)
Environmental biomonitoring, assessment, prediction, and management : certain case studies and related quantitative issuesJournal of Applied Ecology, 19
P. Longley, Michael Batty (1996)
Spatial analysis: Modelling in a GIS environment
D. Kitchener, A. Chapman, J. Dell, B. Muir, M. Palmer (1980)
Lizard assemblage and reserve size and structure in the Western Australian wheatbelt — some implications for conservationBiological Conservation, 17
R. Rafe, M. Usher, R. Jefferson (1985)
Birds on reserves: the influence of area and habitat on species richnessJournal of Applied Ecology, 22
(2000)
Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling 20
D. Faith, P. Minchin, L. Belbin (1987)
Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distanceVegetatio, 69
R. Pressey, S. Ferrier, T. Hager, C. Woods, S. Tully, K. Weinman (1996)
How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales? − Analyses of forest environments in relation to formal protection measures, land tenure, and vulnerability to clearingForest Ecology and Management, 85
Challahan Challahan, Ferris Ferris, Ferris Ferris (1979)
The ordination of aquatic nematode communities as affected by stream water qualityEnvironmental biomonitoring, assessment, prediction, and management – certain case studies and related quantitative issues
Church Church, Sorensen Sorensen (1996)
Integrating normative location models into GIS: problems and prospects with the p ‐median modelSpatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment
D. Faith (2003)
Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species‐level biodiversityEcography, 26
S. Ferrier, M. Drielsma, G. Manion, G. Watson (2002)
Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modellingBiodiversity & Conservation, 11
T. Knight, D. Morris (1996)
How Many Habitats do Landscapes ContainEcology, 77
Magne Sætersdal, H. Birks (1993)
Assessing the representativeness of nature reserves using multivariate analysis: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous forests, western NorwayBiological Conservation, 65
T. Ward, M. Vanderklift, A. Nicholls, R. Kenchington (1999)
SELECTING MARINE RESERVES USING HABITATS AND SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AS SURROGATES FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYEcological Applications, 9
M. Austin, A. Nicholls, C. Margules (1990)
Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus speciesEcological Monographs, 60
D. Pearson, F. Cassola (1992)
World‐Wide Species Richness Patterns of Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): Indicator Taxon for Biodiversity and Conservation StudiesConservation Biology, 6
A. Lombard, R. Cowling, R. Pressey, A. Rebelo (2003)
Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic RegionBiological Conservation, 112
M. Araújo, P. Williams (2001)
The Bias of Complementarity Hotspots toward Marginal PopulationsConservation Biology, 15
J. Scott, F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, T. Edwards, J. Ulliman, R. Wright (1993)
GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
P. Williams, N. Burgess, C. Rahbek (2000)
Flagship species, ecological complementarity and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub‐Saharan AfricaAnimal Conservation, 3
D. Olson, E. Dinerstein (1998)
The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable EcoregionsConservation Biology, 12
R. Panzer, M. Schwartz (1998)
Effectiveness of a Vegetation‐Based Approach to Insect ConservationConservation Biology, 12
K. Gaston, T. Blackburn (2000)
Pattern and Process in Macroecology
Kevin Gaston (1996)
Biodiversity - congruenceProgress in Physical Geography, 20
J. Woinarski, O. Price, D. Faith (1996)
Application of a taxon priority system for conservation planning by selecting areas which are most distinct from environments already reservedBiological Conservation, 76
W. Boecklen (1986)
Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity on the Species-Area Relationships of Forest BirdsJournal of Biogeography, 13
E. Duffey (1997)
Global biodiversity assessmentBiological Conservation, 79
B. Manly (1997)
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
J. Prendergast, B. Eversham (1997)
Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator conceptEcography, 20
P. Densham, G. Rushton (1992)
A more efficient heuristic for solving largep-median problemsPapers in Regional Science, 71
(2000)
Guidance on the interpretation of the biodiversity broad habitat classification (terrestrial and freshwater types): definitions and relationship with other habitat classifications
F. D.P, P. Walker (1996)
Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areasBiodiversity & Conservation, 5
P. Bellamy, S. Hinsley, I. Newton (1996)
Factors influencing bird species numbers in small woods in south-east EnglandJournal of Applied Ecology, 33
L. Webb, J. Tracey, W. Williams, G. Lance (1967)
Studies in the Numerical Analysis of Complex Rain-Forest Communities: II. The Problem of Species-SamplingJournal of Ecology, 55
C. Elton (1949)
Population Interspersion: An Essay on Animal Community PatternsJournal of Ecology, 37
M. Araújo, C. Humphries, P. Densham, R. Lampinen, W. Hagemeijer, A. Mitchell-Jones, J. Gasc (2001)
Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversityEcography, 24
J. Kirkpatrick, M. Brown (1994)
A Comparison of Direct and Environmental Domain Approaches to Planning Reservation of Forest Higher Plant Communities and Species in TasmaniaConservation Biology, 8
D. Faith, R. Norris (1989)
Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebratesBiological Conservation, 50
(1999)
WORLDMAP 4.2 WINDOWS: software and user document 4.1. Privately distributed, London
T. Halliday, J. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Cronbrnja-Isailovic, D. Dolman, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. Rica, H. Maurin, M. Oliveira, T. Sofianidou, M. Veith, A. Zulderwijk (1997)
Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe
E. Erkut (1990)
The discrete p-dispersion problemEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 46
S. Hakimi (1965)
Optimum Distribution of Switching Centers in a Communication Network and Some Related Graph Theoretic ProblemsOperations Research, 13
R. Church, P. Sorensen (1994)
NCGIA National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Integrating Normative Location Models into GIS : Problems and Prospects with the p-median Model
(1999)
From dot maps to bitmaps: Atlas Florae Europaeae goes digital
R. Develice, Jon Martin (2001)
ASSESSING THE EXTENT TO WHICH ROADLESS AREAS COMPLEMENT THE CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYEcological Applications, 11
L. Belbin (1993)
Environmental representativeness: Regional partitioning and reserve selectionBiological Conservation, 66
Yong Cao, D. Larsen, R. Thorne (2001)
Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerationsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 20
B. Reyers, K. Wessels, A. Jaarsveld (2002)
An assessment of biodiversity surrogacy options in the Limpopo Province of South AfricaAfrican Zoology, 37
K. Young (2001)
Habitat diversity and species diversity: testing the competition hypothesis with juvenile salmonidsOikos, 95
A. Long, M. Crosby, A. Stattersfield (1996)
Towards a Global Map of Biodiversity: Patterns in the Distribution of Restricted-Range Birds, 5
J. Scott, F. Davis, R. McGhie, R. Wright, C. Groves, J. Estes (2001)
NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?Ecological Applications, 11
W. Nichols, K. Killingbeck, P. August (1998)
The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity II. A Landscape PerspectiveConservation Biology, 12
J. Gower (1966)
Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysisBiometrika, 53
M. Díaz, R. Carbonell, T. Santos, J. Tellería (1998)
Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux : biogeography, landscape and vegetation effectsJournal of Applied Ecology, 35
L. Belbin (1995)
A multivariate approach to the selection of biological reservesBiodiversity & Conservation, 4
B. Ambuel, S. Temple (1983)
Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin ForestsEcology, 64
K. Wessels, S. Freitag, A. Jaarsveld (1999)
The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scaleBiological Conservation, 89
Unesco. Man (1974)
Task force on : criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of biosphere reserves
Capturing biodiversity : selecting priority areas using different criteria
(2001)
Primer v5: user manual/ tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth
(1972)
Altas Florae Europaeae. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo
S. Ferrier (2002)
Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here?Systematic biology, 51 2
Aim A positive relationship between assemblage diversity (AD) – equivalent to the biotic version of the environment diversity, ED, method – and species diversity has been reported. This being true, reserve networks with many different assemblages would be expected to represent more species than reserve networks including fewer and less different assemblages. This idea was tested using European species atlas distributions of terrestrial vertebrates and plants. It is asked whether: (1) maximizing AD within one group would represent species diversity of this group better than expected by chance; and (2) maximizing AD within one group would represent species diversity of other groups better than expected by chance. Location Europe. Methods Three ordination techniques (non‐metric multidimensional scaling, detrended correspondence analysis and correspondence analysis) are used to summarize patterns of compositional turnover within assemblages. p‐Median location‐allocation models are then calculated from ordination space to measure the degree of expected species representation within the group being sampled as well as the expected representation within other groups. Results are compared with near‐optimal solutions obtained with complementarity‐based algorithms and to a null model obtained by simulating selection of areas at random. Matrix correlation analysis was also performed to investigate broad patterns of covariation in compositional turnover of assemblages of species belonging to different taxonomic groups and these values were compared with correlation in species richness scores between groups. Results The AD model did not always represent more species of the group being sampled than expected by chance (P < 0.05). Results were independent of the method and taxonomic group considered. Effectiveness of AD within one group to represent species of other groups varied, but in most cases it was worse than using complementarity‐based algorithms as a surrogate strategy. Even when correlations indicated high coincidence between assemblages, taxonomic‐based surrogates did not always recover more species than expected by chance (P < 0.05). Main conclusions Results are discussed in the light of two possible explanations: (1) the AD model is based on unrealistic assumptions, namely that species have equal probability of having the centre of their distributions anywhere in ordination space and that species display unimodal, symmetrical, bell‐shaped response curves to gradients; (2) particular implementation of methods may be inadequate to summarize useful complementarity among assemblages, especially for restricted‐range species. We conclude that both arguments are likely to play a role in explaining results, but that opportunities exist to improve performance of existing surrogate strategies.
Journal of Biogeography – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.