Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Ford (2010)
The Family Life Questionnaire: The Construction and Validation of a Novel Measure of Family Functioning
P. Jensen, M. Roper, P. Fisher, John Piacentini, G. Canino, J. Richters, M. Rubio‐Stipec, M. Dulcan, S. Goodman, M. Davies, D. Rae, D. Shaffer, H. Bird, B. Lahey, M. Schwab-Stone (1995)
Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms.Archives of general psychiatry, 52 1
Jeffrey Measelle, Jennifer Ablow, P. Cowan, C. Cowan (1998)
Assessing young children's views of their academic, social, and emotional lives: an evaluation of the self-perception scales of the Berkeley Puppet Interview.Child development, 69 6
T. Ford, J. Hutchings, T. Bywater, A. Goodman, R. Goodman (2009)
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Value Scores: evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventionsBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 194
Ford Ford, Hutchings Hutchings, Bywater Bywater, Goodman Goodman, Goodman Goodman (2009)
Evaluation of the the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Values Score as a method for estimating effectiveness in child mental health interventionsBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 194
Martin Bland, Douglas Altman, Douglas Altaian (1997)
Statistics notes: Cronbach's alphaBMJ, 314
L. Tutty (1995)
Theoretical and Practical Issues in Selecting a Measure of Family FunctioningResearch on Social Work Practice, 5
Ford Ford, Collishaw Collishaw, Meltzer Meltzer, Goodman Goodman (2007)
A prospective study of childhood psychopathology; predictors of change over three yearSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42
Jensen Jensen, Roper Roper, Fisher Fisher, Piacentini Piacentini, Canino Canino, Richters Richters, Rubio‐Stipec Rubio‐Stipec, Dulkan Dulkan, Goodman Goodman, Davies Davies, Rae Rae, Shaffer Shaffer, Bird Bird, Lahey Lahey, Schwab‐Stone Schwab‐Stone (1995)
Test‐retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1)Archives of General Psychiatry, 52
F. Elgar, D. Waschbusch, M. Dadds, Nadine Sigvaldason (2007)
Development and Validation of a Short Form of the Alabama Parenting QuestionnaireJournal of Child and Family Studies, 16
K. Bierman, J. Coie, K. Dodge, M. Greenberg, J. Lochman, R. McMahon, E. Pinderhughes (1999)
Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: II. Classroom effects. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 67 5
Tutty Tutty (1995)
Theoretical and practical selecting a measure of family functioningResearch on Social Work Practice, 5
T. Ford, S. Collishaw, H. Meltzer, R. Goodman (2007)
A prospective study of childhood psychopathology: independent predictors of change over three yearsSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42
R. Goodman (2001)
Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40 11
Jason Jason, Costello Costello (2004)
Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal Component analysisPractical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67
Background: The Family Life Questionnaire (FLQ) is a new measure of family functioning, which acknowledges that the experience of the family unit may vary between different children. This study examined the reliability and sensitivity to change of the FLQ in a clinical population. Method: The FLQ was administered to 91 parents attending the first session of the Incredible Years parenting programmes in Devon during 2009, 71 of them completed it on a second occasion a week later and 55 on a third occasion at the end of the programme. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change were calculated. Results: Internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the scales varied between moderate and very good, except for the discipline and special allowances items which had poor internal consistency when grouped as a scale. The measures showed promising evidence of sensitivity to change. Conclusions: The FLQ is a reliable measure of family function that seems sensitive to change. There is some evidence of validity but a lack of suitable comparators limited this part of the study. The study sample was too small to explore the scale structure.
Child and Adolescent Mental Health – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.