In the past decades, a growing number of investigations, performed in different clinical settings, has been devoted to circadian variations in blood pressure (BP) and to nocturnal BP levels with the aim to clarify their associations with demographic/clinical variables, conventional risk factors, subclinical organ damage, and incident cardiovascular disease. In particular, two lines of clinical research have investigated this issue focusing on the nondipping status and nocturnal hypertension.Although nondipping status, as opposed to the dipping status, is commonly regarded as a clinical trait characterized by more advanced organ damage and a worse cardiovascular prognosis, this issue is still largely debated. This is because a number of studies have failed to show differences in intermediate end points such as cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage and hard outcomes between nondippers and dippers after adjustment for several confounders including average 24‐hour BP values. Moreover, it should be noted that a full preserved BP fall at night (ie, dipping status) may not necessarily result in a normal nighttime BP profile, as defined by the cutoff limits (ie, <120/70 mm Hg) recommended by authoritative hypertension guidelines. This means that dipping status and nocturnal normotension may be dissociated and represent different ambulatory BP phenotypes as shown
Journal of Clinical Hypertension – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud