Quantification of CD34+ cells: comparison of methods

Quantification of CD34+ cells: comparison of methods BACKGROUND: Quantification of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells is predominantly performed by flow cytometric analysis of cells prepared by whole blood staining and red cell lysis. This method also includes cell washing, which is thought to cause the destruction and loss of some of the nucleated cells (NCs). To address this cell loss and its influence on the outcome of enumeration, three techniques for preparing cells for quantification of CD34+ cells were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood (n=179), bone marrow (n=60), and leukapheresis components (n=64) were examined by the use of density separation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) and two red cell‐lysis procedures (wash and no‐ wash). Cell counts were determined in the original materials and after cell preparation. Absolute CD34+ cell counts were calculated using the flow cytometry‐analyzed proportions of CD34+ cells and the various white cell counts. RESULTS: Depending on the cell source and the cell preparation chosen, the loss of NCs ranged between 12 percent and 89 percent of the original white cell number. This loss of NCs was exclusively due to cell washing and predominantly affected granulocytic cells. Analysis of the flow cytometry data revealed that the relative CD34+ values in blood and bone marrow were roughly threefold higher in density separated MNCs than in those that underwent the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. Calculation of absolute CD34+ cell counts confirmed that the MNC procedure underestimated the CD34+ cell content by a median of 26 percent (blood), 21 percent (bone marrow), and 5 percent (leukapheresis component) when compared with the median yield from analysis and cell counting performed after the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. On the other hand, the conventional lysis procedure, which applies the original white cell counts for CD34+ quantification, was shown to overestimate the CD34+ cell content by a median of 1.2‐fold, 1.33‐fold, and 1.13‐ fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither density separation nor the whole‐blood lysis procedure seems appropriate for optimal CD34+ quantification. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Transfusion Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/quantification-of-cd34-cells-comparison-of-methods-Lq0bl0OkFX
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1997 AABB
ISSN
0041-1132
eISSN
1537-2995
DOI
10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37897424398.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantification of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells is predominantly performed by flow cytometric analysis of cells prepared by whole blood staining and red cell lysis. This method also includes cell washing, which is thought to cause the destruction and loss of some of the nucleated cells (NCs). To address this cell loss and its influence on the outcome of enumeration, three techniques for preparing cells for quantification of CD34+ cells were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood (n=179), bone marrow (n=60), and leukapheresis components (n=64) were examined by the use of density separation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) and two red cell‐lysis procedures (wash and no‐ wash). Cell counts were determined in the original materials and after cell preparation. Absolute CD34+ cell counts were calculated using the flow cytometry‐analyzed proportions of CD34+ cells and the various white cell counts. RESULTS: Depending on the cell source and the cell preparation chosen, the loss of NCs ranged between 12 percent and 89 percent of the original white cell number. This loss of NCs was exclusively due to cell washing and predominantly affected granulocytic cells. Analysis of the flow cytometry data revealed that the relative CD34+ values in blood and bone marrow were roughly threefold higher in density separated MNCs than in those that underwent the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. Calculation of absolute CD34+ cell counts confirmed that the MNC procedure underestimated the CD34+ cell content by a median of 26 percent (blood), 21 percent (bone marrow), and 5 percent (leukapheresis component) when compared with the median yield from analysis and cell counting performed after the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. On the other hand, the conventional lysis procedure, which applies the original white cell counts for CD34+ quantification, was shown to overestimate the CD34+ cell content by a median of 1.2‐fold, 1.33‐fold, and 1.13‐ fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither density separation nor the whole‐blood lysis procedure seems appropriate for optimal CD34+ quantification.

Journal

TransfusionWiley

Published: Aug 1, 1997

References

  • Evaluation of red blood cell lysing solutions for the detection of intracellular antigens by flow cytometry
    Tiirikainen, Tiirikainen
  • Effect of fixation on quantification of the expression of leucocyte function‐associated surface antigens
    McCarthy, McCarthy; Macey, Macey; Cahill, Cahill; Newland, Newland

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off