BACKGROUND: Quantification of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells is predominantly performed by flow cytometric analysis of cells prepared by whole blood staining and red cell lysis. This method also includes cell washing, which is thought to cause the destruction and loss of some of the nucleated cells (NCs). To address this cell loss and its influence on the outcome of enumeration, three techniques for preparing cells for quantification of CD34+ cells were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood (n=179), bone marrow (n=60), and leukapheresis components (n=64) were examined by the use of density separation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) and two red cell‐lysis procedures (wash and no‐ wash). Cell counts were determined in the original materials and after cell preparation. Absolute CD34+ cell counts were calculated using the flow cytometry‐analyzed proportions of CD34+ cells and the various white cell counts. RESULTS: Depending on the cell source and the cell preparation chosen, the loss of NCs ranged between 12 percent and 89 percent of the original white cell number. This loss of NCs was exclusively due to cell washing and predominantly affected granulocytic cells. Analysis of the flow cytometry data revealed that the relative CD34+ values in blood and bone marrow were roughly threefold higher in density separated MNCs than in those that underwent the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. Calculation of absolute CD34+ cell counts confirmed that the MNC procedure underestimated the CD34+ cell content by a median of 26 percent (blood), 21 percent (bone marrow), and 5 percent (leukapheresis component) when compared with the median yield from analysis and cell counting performed after the lyse‐and‐wash procedure. On the other hand, the conventional lysis procedure, which applies the original white cell counts for CD34+ quantification, was shown to overestimate the CD34+ cell content by a median of 1.2‐fold, 1.33‐fold, and 1.13‐ fold, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither density separation nor the whole‐blood lysis procedure seems appropriate for optimal CD34+ quantification.
Transfusion – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1997
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera