Public Charities' Affiliation Again Sets Tax Law Trap

Public Charities' Affiliation Again Sets Tax Law Trap The IRS granted a tax‐exempt charitable organization an extension of time to revoke its election of the expenditure test (IRC § 501(h)), thereby enabling it to sidestep tax penalties and perhaps loss of exemption (Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201804005).Three public charities operate to promote health; they are X (formerly known as Y), V, and W. V formally affiliated with Y. As part of that process, Z, an organization of which V is the sole member, became the sole member of Y. Y then changed its name to X.Prior to its affiliation with Y, V retained a “professional services firm” to perform due diligence on the operations and financial state of Y. Y had made the lobbying election. The matter of Y's revocation of the election in advance of the affiliation was not, during this due diligence effort, raised. A few weeks after the affiliation, it was discovered that the lobbying election had been made many years beforehand by Y. Forms 990 filed by Y reference this election.Given the amount of the lobbying expenses by V and its affiliates, and the potential risk to X in being viewed as affiliated with V, W, and other affiliates, X immediately consulted with its tax law advisors to assist in preparation of a request to the IRS for discretionary relief (Reg. § 301.9100). The above ruling is the result. Presumably, Y will timely file the revocation, to eliminate the possibility of an affiliated group and the attendant adverse tax law consequences. [22.3(d)(viii)]Commentary: This outcome has been reported at least once before. See the discussion of Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201239012 in the November 2012 issue. The lesson is that anytime there is an affiliation of public charities this matter of the lobbying election should be on the due diligence checklist. As noted, the fact of the election is referenced in the Form 990. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bruce R Hopkins' Nonprofit Counsel Wiley

Public Charities' Affiliation Again Sets Tax Law Trap

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/wiley/public-charities-affiliation-again-sets-tax-law-trap-pP0j0g0jIK
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1542-8419
eISSN
1542-8427
D.O.I.
10.1002/npc.30452
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The IRS granted a tax‐exempt charitable organization an extension of time to revoke its election of the expenditure test (IRC § 501(h)), thereby enabling it to sidestep tax penalties and perhaps loss of exemption (Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201804005).Three public charities operate to promote health; they are X (formerly known as Y), V, and W. V formally affiliated with Y. As part of that process, Z, an organization of which V is the sole member, became the sole member of Y. Y then changed its name to X.Prior to its affiliation with Y, V retained a “professional services firm” to perform due diligence on the operations and financial state of Y. Y had made the lobbying election. The matter of Y's revocation of the election in advance of the affiliation was not, during this due diligence effort, raised. A few weeks after the affiliation, it was discovered that the lobbying election had been made many years beforehand by Y. Forms 990 filed by Y reference this election.Given the amount of the lobbying expenses by V and its affiliates, and the potential risk to X in being viewed as affiliated with V, W, and other affiliates, X immediately consulted with its tax law advisors to assist in preparation of a request to the IRS for discretionary relief (Reg. § 301.9100). The above ruling is the result. Presumably, Y will timely file the revocation, to eliminate the possibility of an affiliated group and the attendant adverse tax law consequences. [22.3(d)(viii)]Commentary: This outcome has been reported at least once before. See the discussion of Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201239012 in the November 2012 issue. The lesson is that anytime there is an affiliation of public charities this matter of the lobbying election should be on the due diligence checklist. As noted, the fact of the election is referenced in the Form 990.

Journal

Bruce R Hopkins' Nonprofit CounselWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial