Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Grant, Dana Gheorghe, Wenjun Zheng, M. Alonso, G. Huber, M. Długosz, J., Andrew McCammon, R. Cross (2011)
Electrostatically Biased Binding of Kinesin to MicrotubulesPLoS Biology, 9
J. Janin (1997)
The kinetics of protein‐protein recognitionProteins: Structure, 28
K. Plaxco, K. Simons, D. Baker (1998)
Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.Journal of molecular biology, 277 4
C. Ottmann (2017)
Protein-Protein Interactions.Drug discovery today. Technologies, 24
M. Das, G. Basu (2009)
Coulomb energies of protein-protein complexes with monopole-free charge distributions.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 27 7
M. Długosz, J. Antosiewicz (2013)
Hydrodynamic effects on the relative rotational velocity of associating proteins.The journal of physical chemistry. B, 117 20
Huan‐Xiang Zhou, P. Bates (2013)
Modeling protein association mechanisms and kinetics.Current opinion in structural biology, 23 6
R. Stewart, Ricaele Bruggen (2004)
Association and dissociation kinetics for CheY interacting with the P2 domain of CheA.Journal of molecular biology, 336 1
P. Kastritis, I. Moal, Howook Hwang, Z. Weng, P. Bates, A. Bonvin, J. Janin (2011)
A structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinityProtein Science, 20
P. Kastritis, A. Bonvin (2010)
Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark.Journal of proteome research, 9 5
G. Schreiber, G. Haran, Huan‐Xiang Zhou (2009)
Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics.Chemical reviews, 109 3
Jennifer Alexander-Brett, D. Fremont (2007)
Dual GPCR and GAG mimicry by the M3 chemokine decoy receptorThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 204
R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca Wade (1997)
Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar.Biophysical journal, 72 5
C. Chothia, J. Janin (1975)
Principles of protein–protein recognitionNature, 256
T. Selzer, S. Albeck, G. Schreiber (2000)
Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexesNature Structural Biology, 7
E. Paci, K. Lindorff-Larsen, C. Dobson, M. Karplus, M. Vendruscolo (2005)
Transition state contact orders correlate with protein folding rates.Journal of molecular biology, 352 3
Howook Hwang, B. Pierce, J. Mintseris, J. Janin, Z. Weng (2008)
Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0Proteins: Structure, 73
Howook Hwang, T. Vreven, J. Janin, Z. Weng (2010)
Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0Proteins: Structure, 78
Janin (2013)
Protein-protein interactionsCurr Opin Struct Biol, 23
Hui Li, A. Robertson, Jan Jensen (2005)
Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa valuesProteins: Structure, 61
S. Northrup, J. Reynolds, C. Miller, K. Forrest, J. Boles (1987)
Diffusion‐Controlled Association Rate of Cytochrome c and Cytochrome c Peroxidase in a Simple Electrostatic ModelChemInform, 18
J. Janin, R. Bahadur, P. Chakrabarti (2008)
Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structureQuarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 41
A. Sali, T. Blundell (1993)
Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.Journal of molecular biology, 234 3
B. Persson, Mikael Lund (2009)
Association and electrostatic steering of alpha-lactalbumin-lysozyme heterodimers.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 11 39
Sanbo Qin, Xiaodong Pang, Huan‐Xiang Zhou (2011)
Automated prediction of protein association rate constants.Structure, 19 12
G. Schreiber (2002)
Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions.Current opinion in structural biology, 12 1
I. Moal, P. Bates (2012)
Kinetic Rate Constant Prediction Supports the Conformational Selection Mechanism of Protein BindingPLoS Computational Biology, 8
A. Nicholls, B. Honig (1991)
A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over‐relaxation to solve the Poisson–Boltzmann equationJournal of Computational Chemistry, 12
Sangyoon Lee, G. Chirikjian (2004)
Interhelical angle and distance preferences in globular proteins.Biophysical journal, 86 2
W. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. Bayly, I. Gould, K. Merz, D. Ferguson, D. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. Caldwell, P. Kollman (1995)
A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins
M. Harel, A. Spaar, G. Schreiber (2009)
Fruitful and futile encounters along the association reaction between proteins.Biophysical journal, 96 10
R. Gabdoulline, R. Wade (2002)
Biomolecular diffusional association.Current opinion in structural biology, 12 2
M. Długosz, G. Huber, J. McCammon, J. Trylska (2011)
Brownian dynamics study of the association between the 70S ribosome and elongation factor GBiopolymers, 95
G. Basu, Dakshanamurthy Sivanesan, T. Kawabata, N. Go (2004)
Electrostatic potential of nucleotide-free protein is sufficient for discrimination between adenine and guanine-specific binding sites.Journal of molecular biology, 342 3
Todd Dolinsky, J. Nielsen, J. McCammon, Nathan Baker (2004)
PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculationsNucleic acids research, 32 Web Server issue
Hongjun Bai, Kun Yang, Daqi Yu, Changsheng Zhang, Fangjin Chen, L. Lai (2011)
Predicting kinetic constants of protein–protein interactions based on structural propertiesProteins: Structure, 79
Northrup (1986)
Diffusion-controlled association rate of cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase in a simple electrostatic modelJ Am Chem Soc, 108
ABSTRACT Understanding factors that drive protein–protein association is of fundamental importance. We show that a single geometric parameter in crystal structures of protein–protein complexes, the angle between the electric dipole of one subunit and the partner‐generated electric field at the same subunit, linearly correlates with experimentally determined protein–protein association rates. Imprint of a dynamic kinetic process in a single static geometric parameter, associated with mutual electrostatic orientation of subunits in protein–protein complexes, is elegant and demonstrates the universality of electrostatic steering in attenuating protein–protein association rates. That the essence of a complex phenomenon could be captured by properties of the final crystal structure of the complex implies that the electrostatic orientations of protein subunits in crystal structures and the associated transition states are nearly identical. Further, the cosine of the angle, alone, is shown to be sufficient in predicting association rate constants, with accuracies comparable to currently available predictors that use more intricate methodologies. Our results offer mechanistic insights and could be useful in development of coarse‐grained models. Proteins 2015; 83:1557–1562. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Proteins: Structure Function and Bioinformatics – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.