Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade

Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as... Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVES To assess the discrepancy between needle biopsy (NB) and radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason score (GS) in Irish men, specifically the influence of the stratification of GS 4 + 3 on overall levels of agreement, levels of discrepancy and κ coefficients, as the GS assigned to prostate cancer NBs affects clinical decision‐making and influences future therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed retrospectively a database of the discrepancies between NB and RP Gleason grades (GG) from 2003 to 2008. All patients had clinically localized prostate cancer, and none had had neoadjuvant therapy. Grading of 206 NB specimens was compared with their corresponding RP specimens. The discrepancy rate between NB and RP GS was assessed for each combination of GG. Intermediate‐ (GS 7, defined as GS 3 + 4 alone vs GS 7) and high‐grade (GS 4 + 3 and GS 8–10 vs GS 8–10) classifications were compared. The level of agreement and the κ coefficient for each system was assessed. RESULTS In NB, GS 6 was most frequently diagnosed (53%); after RP, GS 3 + 4 was most frequent (36%). In 42% of cases the exact GG remained unchanged after RP, increasing to 48% for GS 6 and GS 3 + 4. Overall 42% of cases showed an increase in their GG. In GS 6 NBs, the rate of increase in the primary GG or increase in the GS was 52%. Biopsy GS 6 and 3 + 4 showed the highest levels of agreement between NB and RP. Low‐grade prostate cancer on NB was upgraded in 52% of cases; high‐grade prostatic adenocarcinoma was downgraded in 27–77% of cases depending on the grading system used. CONCLUSIONS Classification of high‐grade prostate cancer as GS 4 + 3 and GS 8–10 results in higher levels of agreement between NB and RP GS. Reliable identification of well differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in NB specimens represents an ongoing diagnostic challenge, necessitating careful preoperative consideration of the definitive grade of a patient’s disease. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png BJU International Wiley

Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/prostate-cancer-grading-the-effect-of-stratification-of-needle-biopsy-PlElGG5BOd
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2009 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2009 BJU INTERNATIONAL
ISSN
1464-4096
eISSN
1464-410X
DOI
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08810.x
pmid
19732053
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVES To assess the discrepancy between needle biopsy (NB) and radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason score (GS) in Irish men, specifically the influence of the stratification of GS 4 + 3 on overall levels of agreement, levels of discrepancy and κ coefficients, as the GS assigned to prostate cancer NBs affects clinical decision‐making and influences future therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed retrospectively a database of the discrepancies between NB and RP Gleason grades (GG) from 2003 to 2008. All patients had clinically localized prostate cancer, and none had had neoadjuvant therapy. Grading of 206 NB specimens was compared with their corresponding RP specimens. The discrepancy rate between NB and RP GS was assessed for each combination of GG. Intermediate‐ (GS 7, defined as GS 3 + 4 alone vs GS 7) and high‐grade (GS 4 + 3 and GS 8–10 vs GS 8–10) classifications were compared. The level of agreement and the κ coefficient for each system was assessed. RESULTS In NB, GS 6 was most frequently diagnosed (53%); after RP, GS 3 + 4 was most frequent (36%). In 42% of cases the exact GG remained unchanged after RP, increasing to 48% for GS 6 and GS 3 + 4. Overall 42% of cases showed an increase in their GG. In GS 6 NBs, the rate of increase in the primary GG or increase in the GS was 52%. Biopsy GS 6 and 3 + 4 showed the highest levels of agreement between NB and RP. Low‐grade prostate cancer on NB was upgraded in 52% of cases; high‐grade prostatic adenocarcinoma was downgraded in 27–77% of cases depending on the grading system used. CONCLUSIONS Classification of high‐grade prostate cancer as GS 4 + 3 and GS 8–10 results in higher levels of agreement between NB and RP GS. Reliable identification of well differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in NB specimens represents an ongoing diagnostic challenge, necessitating careful preoperative consideration of the definitive grade of a patient’s disease.

Journal

BJU InternationalWiley

Published: Mar 1, 2010

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off