Predicting the spatial distribution of non‐indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent

Predicting the spatial distribution of non‐indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale... 1. The existence of a hierarchical scheme of environmental controls on the spatial distribution of plant species was explored for three non‐indigenous weeds, Fallopia japonica, Heracleum mantegazzianum and Impatiens glandulifera, in the British Isles. 2. Logistic regression analyses of the presence/absence of the three weed species examined the relative importance of 60 environmental variables, encompassing land cover, geology and climate. Analyses were undertaken using variables assessed at a hectad (10 × 10 km) or tetrad (2 × 2 km) resolution at national (England and Wales) and regional (County Durham, UK) spatial extents. 3. The ranges of all three species in the British Isles are currently increasing, and the non‐equilibrium nature of their distribution limited the goodness‐of‐fit of logistic models. Interpretation of whether a species has expanded to occupy entirely its potential spatial range was scale‐dependent, and species' distributions, when viewed at coarser spatial scales, may be more likely to be interpreted as having reached stasis. 4. Spatial autocorrelation was more evident at the finer tetrad spatial resolution for both F. japonica and I. glandulifera, but not evident at all for H. mantegazzianum. Only the distribution of I. glandulifera revealed significant spatial autocorrelation among hectads at the national scale. These patterns appear related to the different dispersal mechanisms of the three species. 5. The majority of the environmental variables identified as important at the tetrad resolution for County Durham were also important at the hectad resolution for England and Wales for both F. japonica and I. glandulifera, but not for H. mantegazzianum. However, for all three species the environmental variables identified as significant were consistent with qualitative descriptions of the species' habitat characteristics. There was no evidence of a hierarchy of environmental controls. 6. At the regional extent, scaling‐up species' distributions from tetrads to hectads was relatively successful, but scaling‐down was not. The coarser resolution models were too unrefined to model fine‐scale distributions successfully. Similarly, at a coarse hectad resolution, regional models were poor predictors of national species' distributions. It therefore appears that scaling‐up from fine to coarse resolution is appropriate when spatial extent is held constant, and focusing‐down from large to small spatial extents is appropriate when data resolution is held constant. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Ecology Wiley

Predicting the spatial distribution of non‐indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/wiley/predicting-the-spatial-distribution-of-non-indigenous-riparian-weeds-q6g8ALc19O
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0021-8901
eISSN
1365-2664
D.O.I.
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00556.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1. The existence of a hierarchical scheme of environmental controls on the spatial distribution of plant species was explored for three non‐indigenous weeds, Fallopia japonica, Heracleum mantegazzianum and Impatiens glandulifera, in the British Isles. 2. Logistic regression analyses of the presence/absence of the three weed species examined the relative importance of 60 environmental variables, encompassing land cover, geology and climate. Analyses were undertaken using variables assessed at a hectad (10 × 10 km) or tetrad (2 × 2 km) resolution at national (England and Wales) and regional (County Durham, UK) spatial extents. 3. The ranges of all three species in the British Isles are currently increasing, and the non‐equilibrium nature of their distribution limited the goodness‐of‐fit of logistic models. Interpretation of whether a species has expanded to occupy entirely its potential spatial range was scale‐dependent, and species' distributions, when viewed at coarser spatial scales, may be more likely to be interpreted as having reached stasis. 4. Spatial autocorrelation was more evident at the finer tetrad spatial resolution for both F. japonica and I. glandulifera, but not evident at all for H. mantegazzianum. Only the distribution of I. glandulifera revealed significant spatial autocorrelation among hectads at the national scale. These patterns appear related to the different dispersal mechanisms of the three species. 5. The majority of the environmental variables identified as important at the tetrad resolution for County Durham were also important at the hectad resolution for England and Wales for both F. japonica and I. glandulifera, but not for H. mantegazzianum. However, for all three species the environmental variables identified as significant were consistent with qualitative descriptions of the species' habitat characteristics. There was no evidence of a hierarchy of environmental controls. 6. At the regional extent, scaling‐up species' distributions from tetrads to hectads was relatively successful, but scaling‐down was not. The coarser resolution models were too unrefined to model fine‐scale distributions successfully. Similarly, at a coarse hectad resolution, regional models were poor predictors of national species' distributions. It therefore appears that scaling‐up from fine to coarse resolution is appropriate when spatial extent is held constant, and focusing‐down from large to small spatial extents is appropriate when data resolution is held constant.

Journal

Journal of Applied EcologyWiley

Published: Sep 1, 2000

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off